We investigated the hypotheses that windows, doors, pathways, and size of the house in the House drawing of the House-Tree-Person projective drawing technique reflect psychological and social accessibility by correlating these variables with the Social Introversion scale of the MMPI–2. Subjects were 153 nonclinical, community adults, and 146 clinical patients currently receiving mental health services. While there were strong correlations among these figure-drawing variables, suggesting some common underlying dimension, these scores were not significantly correlated with psychological accessibility as measured by the Si scale of the MMPI–2. Possible interpretations were suggested.
ArcherR. P. (1996) MMPI-Rorschach interrelationships: proposed criteria for evaluating explanatory models. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 504–515.
3.
ArcherR. P.KrishnamurthyR. (1993) A review of MMPI and Rorschach interrelationships in adult samples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 61, 277–293.
4.
BuckJ. N. (1970) The House-Tree-Person technique: revised manual. Beverly Hills, CA: Western Psychological Services.
5.
BuckJ. N.WarrenW. L. (1992) House-Tree-Person projective drawing technique: manual and interpretive guide. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
6.
ButcherJ. N.DahlstromW. G.GrahamJ. R.TellegenA.KaemmerB. (1987) Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory—2: manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis, MN: Univer. of Minnesota Press.
7.
CraigR. J. (1999) Interpreting personal tests: (MMPI–2, MCMI-III, CPIR–R, and 16PF). New York: Wiley.
8.
CraigR. J.OlsonR. (1997) Assessing PTSD with the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory–III. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53, 943–952.
9.
DahlstromW. G.LacharD.DahlstromL. E. (1986) MMPI patterns of American minorities. Minneapolis, MN: Univer. of Minnesota Press.
10.
DaubertV.Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 2786, L.Ed.2d (U.S. 113 S. Ct, 1993)
11.
DrakeL. E. (1980) Scale 0 (Social Introversion). In DahlstromW. G.DahlstromL. (Eds.), Basic readings on the MMPI. Minneapolis, MN: Univer. of Minnesota Press. Pp. 76–79.
12.
DrakeL. E.ThredeW. B. (1980) Further validation of Scale 0 (Social Introversion). In DahlstromW. G.DahlstromL. (Eds.), Basic readings on the MMPI. Minneapolis, MN: Univer. of Minnesota Press Pp. 80–82.
13.
GanellenR. J. (1996) Exploring MMPI-Rorschach relationships. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 529–542.
14.
GreeneR. L. (1991) The MMPI/MMPI–2: an interpretive manual. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
15.
HammerE. F. (1958) The clinical application of projective drawings. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
16.
HammerE. F. (1997) Advances in projective drawing interpretation: collected papers. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
17.
HandlerL. (1996) The clinical use of drawings. In NewmarkC. (Ed.), Major psychological assessment instruments. (2nd ed.) Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Pp. 206–293.
18.
HillerJ. B.RosenthalR.BornsteinR. F.BorisD. T.Brunell-NeulibS. (1999) A comparative meta-analysis of Rorschach and MMPI validity. Psychological Assessment, 11, 278–296.
19.
JoinerT. E.SchmidtK. L. (1997) Drawing conclusions—or not—from drawings. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 476–481.
20.
JoinerT. E.SchmidtK. L.BarnettJ. (1996) Size, detail, and line heaviness in children's drawings as correlates of emotional distress: (more) negative evidence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 127–141.
21.
JollesI. (1971) A catalogue for the qualitative interpretation of the House-Tree-Person (H-T-P). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
22.
KahillS. (1984) Human figure drawings in adults: an update of the empirical evidence. 1967–1982. Canadian Psychology, 25, 269–292.
23.
LallyS. J. (2000) Should human figure drawings be admitted in court?Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Personality Assessment, Albuquerque, NM, March.
24.
MachoverK. (1949) Personality projection in the drawings of the human figure. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
25.
MachoverK. (1951) Drawing of the human figure: a method of personality investigation. In AndersonH.AndersonG. (Eds.), An introduction to projective techniques and other devices for understanding the dynamics of human behavior. New YorkPrentice-Hall. Pp. 341–369.
26.
MeyerG. J.RiethmillerR. J.BrooksR. D.BenoitW. A.HandlerL. (2000) A replication of Rorschach and MMPI-2 convergent validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 74, 175–215.
27.
OgdenD. P. (2001) Psychodiagnostics and personality assessment: a handbook. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
28.
RiethmillerR. J.HandlerL. (1997) Problematic methods and unwarranted conclusions in DAP research: suggestions for improved research procedures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 459–472.
29.
RobachH. B. (1968) Human figure drawings: their utility in the clinical psychologist's armamentarium for personality assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 1019.
30.
SmithD.DumontF. (1995) A cautionary study: unwarranted interpretations of the Draw-A-Person test. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 298–303.
31.
SwensenC. H. (1968) Empirical evaluations of human figure drawings: 1957–1966. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 20–44.
32.
UrbanW. H. (1983) The Draw-A-Person: catalogue for interpretive analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
33.
VernerC. M. (1952) Projective drawings. New York: Grune & Stratton.
34.
WardL. C.PerryM. S. (1998) Measurement of social introversion by the MMPI–2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 171–182.
35.
WatkinsC. E.CampbellV. L.NieberdingR.HallmarkR. (1995) Contemporary practice of psychological assessment by clinical psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 54–60.
36.
WenckL. S. (1992) House-Tree-Person drawings: an illustrated diagnostic handbook. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
