This study assessed differences in response rate when the author of a survey was identified as a graduate student or a faculty member. A survey on research ethics was mailed to 500 nurse faculty members with half of the covering letters signed as a graduate student and half signed as a faculty member. There were 388 (78%) out of a possible 495 surveys returned. The response rate was 78% for graduate student and 77% for faculty identifications, not significant by chi-square test.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbreckP. L.SettleR. B. (1995) The survey research handbook. (2nd ed.) Boston, MA: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
2.
DillmanD. A. (1972) Increasing mail questionnaire response in large samples of the general public. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 254–257.
3.
ForsgrenR. A. (1989) Increasing mail survey response rates: methods for small business researchers. Journal of Small Business Management, 27, 61–66.
4.
FoxR. J.CraskM. R.KimJ. (1988) Mail survey response rate: a meta-analysis of selected techniques for inducing responses. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 467–491.
5.
JonesW. H.LindaG. (1978) Multiple criteria effects in a mail survey experiment. Journal of Marketing Research, 15, 280–284.
6.
KingK. A.PealerL. N.BernardA. L. (2001) Increasing response rates to mail questionnaires: review of inducement strategies. American Journal of Health Education, 32, 4–15.
7.
MangioneT. W. (1995) Mail surveys: improving the quality. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
McDermottR. J.SarvelaP. D. (1999) Health education evaluation and measurement: a practitioner's perspective. (2nd ed.) New York: WCB/McGraw Hill.
9.
SingerE.Von ThurinD. R.MillerE. R. (1995) Confidentiality assurances and responses: a quantitative review of the literature. Public Opinion Quarterly, 59, 66–77.
