Two samples of undergraduates (36 women, 7 men; 44 women, 45 men) read a mock transcript in which a murderer's victim was a man or a woman, after which they made prison sentence and death penalty judgments. Female judges gave longer sentences for the female victim than for the male victim, whereas male judges gave longer sentences for the male victim than for the female victim. This same-sex bias suggests that extralegal factors can affect judgments about sentencing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CohenJ. (1977) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (Rev. ed.) New York: Academic Press.
2.
DeSantisA.KaysonW. A. (1997) Defendants' characteristics of attractiveness, race, and sex and sentencing decisions. Psychological Reports, 81, 679–683.
3.
ElkinsT. J.PhillipsJ. S.KonopaskeR. (2001) Evaluating gender discrimination claims: is there a gender similarity bias?Sex Roles, 44, 1–15.
4.
FaulknerG. L.SteffensmeierD. J. (1979) Effects of defendant's sex and age status on severity of punishment: an experimental test. Psychological Reports, 45, 917–918.
5.
GebotysR. J.RobertsJ. V. (1987) Public views of sentencing: the role of the offender. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 19, 479–488.
6.
HoneymanJ. C.OgloffJ. R. P. (1996) Capital punishment: arguments for life and death. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 28, 27–35.
7.
MazzellaR.FeingoldA. (1994) The effects of physical attractiveness, race, socioeconomic status, and gender of defendants and victims on judgments of mock jurors: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1315–1344.
8.
McKelvieS. J.MitchellM.ArnottR.SullivanM. (1993) Effects of offenders' and victims' characteristics on severity of punishment. Psychological Reports, 72, 399–402.
9.
McNamaraK.VattanoEVineyW. (1993) Verdict, sentencing, and certainty as a function of sex of juror and amount of evidence in a simulated rape trial. Psychological Reports, 72, 575–583.
10.
MoranG.ComfortJ. C. (1986) Neither “tentative” nor “fragmentary”: verdict preference of impaneled felony jurors as a function of attitude toward capital punishment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 146–155.
11.
RiedelR. G.II. (1993) Effects of pretrial publicity on male and female jurors and judges in a mock rape trial. Psychological Reports, 73, 819–832.
12.
SchutteJ. W.HoschH. M. (1997) Gender differences in sexual assault verdicts: a meta-analysis. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 759–772.
13.
WilbanksW. (1988) Are elderly felons treated more leniently by the criminal justice system?International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 26, 275–288.
14.
WuenschK. L.CastellowW. A.MooreC. H. (1991) Effects of defendant attractiveness and type of crime on juridic judgment. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 713–724.
