The design and description of the psychometric properties of a Kindergarten Behavior Rating Scale used to predict later academic achievement were based on a survey of past literature on efficient predictors of school failure which indicated a need for a scale that identifies kindergarten pupils who are at risk for school failure during their elementary education. The scale, developed over a 3-yr. period, significantly predicted academic achievement in reading, writing, and mathematics, as indicated by correlations, .15 and .66 between scores on the scale and academic achievement in Grades 1 and 2. Use of judgment by kindergarten teachers to assess risks was also considered, as are other suggestions and limitations on the further use.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994) DSM-IV: Manuel diagnostique et statistique des troubles mentaux. Paris: Masson.
2.
AttwellA. A.OrpetR. E.MeyersC. E. (1967) Kindergarten behavior ratings as a predictor of academic achievement, Journal of School Psychology, 6, 43–46.
3.
BennettK. J.LipmanE. L.BrownS.RacineY.BoyleM. H.OffordD. R. (1999) Predicting conduct problems: can high-risk children be identified in kindergarten and Grade 1?Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 67, 470–480.
4.
Berrueta-ClementJ. R.SchweinhartL. J.BarnettW. S.EpsteinA. S.WeikartD. P. (1984) Changed lives: the effects of the Perry Preschool Program on youths through age 19. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Educational Research Foundation.
5.
BramlettR. K.RowellR. K.MandenbergK. (2000) Predicting first grade achievement from kindergarten screening measures: comparison of child and family predictors. Research in the Schools, 7, 1–9.
6.
CadieuxA.LeducA. (1992) L'identification des élèves à risque. Apprentissage et socialisation, 15, 101–108.
7.
DonohueP. L.FinneganR. J.LutkusA. D.AllenN. L.CampbellJ. R. (2001) The nation's repot card: fourth-grade reading 2000. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
8.
FeltonR.BrownI. (1990) Phonological processes as predictors of specific reading skills in children at risk for reading failure. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 39–59.
9.
FeshbackS.AdelmanH.FullerW. (1974) Early identification of children with risk of reading failure. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7, 639–644.
10.
FletcherJ. M.FoormanB. R. (1994) Issues in definition and measurement of learning disabilities: the need for early intervention. In LyonG. R. (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Brookes. Pp. 185–200.
11.
FlynnJ. M.RahbarM. H. (1998) Improving teacher prediction of children at risk of reading failure. Psychology in the Schools, 35, 163–172.
12.
FrymierJ.GansnederB. (1989) The Phi Delta Kappa study of students at risk. Phi Delta Kappa, 71, 142–146.
13.
GabrielR. M.AndersonP. S. (1987) Identifying at risk youth in the Northwest states: a regional database. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory Program Report, Portland, OR. (ERIC Document No ED 282 125)
14.
GreenbergM. T.LenguaL. J.CoieJ. D. (1999) Predicting developmental outcomes at school entry using a multiple-risk model: four American communities. Developmental Psychology, 35, 503–517.
15.
GreshamF. M.MacMillanD. L.BocianK. M. (1997) Teachers as “tests”: differential validity of teacher judgments in identifying students at-risk for learning difficulties. School Psychology Review, 26, 47–60.
16.
KaufmanP.KwonJ. Y.KleinS.ChapmanD. C. (2000) Dropout rates in the United States: 1999. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
17.
LennonJ. M. (1989) The at risk child: early identification, intervention, and evaluation of early childhood strategies. (Exit project, Indiana Univer. at South Bend) (ERIC Document No. ED 310 860)
18.
LyonG. R. (Ed.) (1994) Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
19.
MantzicopouklosP. Y.MorrissonD. (1994) Early prediction of reading achievement: exploring relationship of cognitive and noncognitive measures to inaccurate classifications of at-risk status. Remedial and Special Education, 15, 244–251.
20.
MartinP. R. (1986) Assessment of the social and emotional functioning of preschool children. School Psychology Review, 15, 216–232.
21.
MercerC. D.AlgozzineB.TrifilettiJ. (1979) Early identification: an analysis of the research. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 2, 12–24.
22.
Ministère de l'Éduçation du Québec. (2000) Indicateurs de l'Éducation. (1st ed.) Québec: Ministère de l'Éducation du Québec.
23.
PellicanoR. R. (1987) A review of social advantage. Educational Leadership, 44, 47–49.
24.
PhlegarJ. M. (1987) Good beginnings for young children: early identification of high risk youth and programs that promote success. Regional Laboratory for Educational Improvement of the Northeast R Islands, Andover, MA. (ERIC Document No. ED 290 574)
25.
PichéC.RoyB.CoutureG. (1992) Le projet Apprenti-Sage: une expérience précoce et à long terme auprès d'enfants à hauts risques psychosociaux. Apprentissage et socialisation, 15, 145–158.
26.
PotvinP.DeslandesR.LeclercD. (2000) Variables prédictives du redoublement au premier cycle primarie, chez les élèves de maternelle [Retention predictors in kindergarten and primary school]. Science et comportement, 28, 145–160.
27.
RosentalR. A.JacobsonL. (1971) Pygmalion à l'école. Paris: Casterman.
28.
SameroffA. J.SeiferR.BarocasR. (1987) Intelligence quotient scores of 4 year old children: social-environmental risk factors. Pediatrics, 79, 343–350.
29.
ScarboroughH. S. (1998) Early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities: phonological awareness and some other promising predictors. In ShapiroB. K.AccardoP. J.CaputeA. J. (Eds.), Specific reading disability: a view of the spectrum. Timonium, MD: York. Pp. 75–119.
30.
ShapiroB. K.AccardoP. J.CaputeA. J. (Eds.) (1998) Specific reading disability: a view of the spectrum. Timonium, MD: York.
31.
SilvermanE. (1971) Situational variability of preschoolers' disfluency: preliminary study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 33, 1021–1022.
32.
SimnerM. L. (1982) Printing errors in kindergarten and the prediction of academic performance. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15, 155–159.
33.
SimnerM. L. (1983) The warning signs of school failure: an updated profile of the at-risk kindergarten child. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 3, 17–27.
34.
SnowC. E.BarnesW. S.ChandlerJ.GoodmanI. F.HemphillL. (1991) Unfulfilled expectations: home and school influences on literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univer. Press.
35.
StevensonH. W.ParkerT.WilkinsonA.HegionA.FishE. (1976a) Longitudinal study of individual difference in cognitive development and scholastic achievement, Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 377–400.
36.
StevensonH. W.ParkerT.WilkinsonA.HegionA.FishE. (1976b) Predictive value of teachers' rating of young children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 507–517.
37.
StrullyC. F. (1977) Test analyses: screening and verification instruments for preschool children. Harrisburg, PA: Penn State Department of Education.
38.
ThurlowM. L.O'SullivanP.YsseldykeJ. E. (1986) Early screening for special education: how accurate?Educational Leadership, 44, 93–95.
39.
TjossemT. D. (1976) Interventions—strategies for high risk children and young children. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
40.
WhiteS. H. (1988) Opening the door: taking a new look at research about the programs for disadvantaged young children and their parents. Young Children, 44, 66–70.
