This study investigated the effect of cooperative learning on eighth grade students' performance in algebra. 54 boys and 57 girls in four middle-school mathematics classes of Grade 8 in the UAE participated. Over a 3-wk. period, two classes (57 students) were taught using a cooperative learning method, and the other two classes (54 students) were taught using the traditional lecture method. Analysis of covariance using pretest scores as a covariant showed no statistically significant increase in the algebra performance for students in the cooperative learning groups compared with the traditional groups. However, boys in the cooperative setting improved significantly on the performance test compared with boys in the traditional setting.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abu ZeinahF. (1982) [Mathematics curriculum and the fundamentals of teaching it]. Amman, Jordan: Dar-Alfurqan in Arabic]
2.
Abu ZyedS. (1986) [The effect of group instruction method on students' achievement in eighth grade mathematics in Jordan]. Unpublished Master of Education thesis, Univer. of Jordan. [in Arabic]
3.
AdedayoO. A. (1999) Differential effectiveness by gender of instructional methods on achievement in mathematics at tertiary level. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37, 83–91.
4.
Al-KhashabM. (1985) [Studies in the sociology of the family]. Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Annahda Alarabia in Arabic]
5.
AlkhateebH. M. (2001) Gender differences in mathematics achievement among high school students in the United Arab Emirates, 1991–2000. School Science and Mathematics, 101(1), 5–9.
6.
AlkhateebH. M.JumaaM. (2000) Middle-school students of United Arab Emirates: effects of heterogeneous small group work on attitudes toward mathematics. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91, 483–490.
7.
AlkhateebH.JumaaM. (2000) A study of the effectiveness of cooperative learning on the mathematics achievement of eighth grade students in United Arab Emirates. In ElaydiS.AllanF.ElkhaderA.MughrabiT.SalehM. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second Palestinian International Conference on Mathematics, Birzeit Univer. and An-Najah Univer., Nablus, Palestine, August 19–23, 1998. River Edge, NJ: World Scientific. Pp. 8–18.
8.
Al-SulaitiD. A. (1990) [Specificities of socialization of children in the families of the Gulf countries prior to oil era: the case of Qatar]. [Social Affairs Review (Journal of Social Scientists' Association, United Arab Emirates)], 45, 5–25. [in Arabic]
9.
ArtztA. F.NewmanC. M. (1997) How to use cooperative learning in the mathematics class. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
10.
BendaniaA.AbedA. (1997) Reliability and factorial structure of an Arabic translation of the Self-consciousness Scale. Psychological Reports, 81, 1091–1101.
11.
BronholtL. J.GoodnowJ.ConneyG. H. (1994) Influences of gender stereotypes on adolescents' perceptions of their own achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 675–692.
12.
BurnsC. W. (1996) Content validity, face validity, and quantitative face validity. In BarrettR. S. (Ed.), Fair employment strategies in human resource management. Westport, CT: Quorum Books. Pp. 38–46.
13.
CronbachL. (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.
14.
FarivarS. (1993) Prosocial attitudes and achievement in middle school mathematics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA, April 12–16.
15.
GayL. R. (2000) Educational research: competencies for analysis and application. (6th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
16.
GhameriM. H. (1990) [Child socialization in the United Arab Emirates' society]. In Social Scientists' Association (Eds.), [Studies in the United Arab Emirates' society]. Vol. 1. Sharjah, UAE: Social Affairs Review. Pp. 34–56. [in Arabic]
17.
HedgesL. V.NowellA. (1995) Sex differences in mental test scores, variability and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269, 41–45.
18.
JacobsD.WatsonT.SuttonJ. (1996) Effects of a cooperative learning method on mathematics achievement and affective outcomes of students in a private elementary school. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 29, 195–202.
19.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (1995) Cooperative learning and nonacademic outcomes of schooling. In PedersenJ. E.BigbyA. D. (Eds.), Secondary schools and cooperative learning: theories, models, and strategies. New York: Garland. Pp. 81–152.
20.
MittelbergD.Lev-AriL. (1999) Confidence in mathematics and its consequences: gender differences among Israeli Jewish youth. Gender and Education, 11, 75–92.
21.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989) Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
22.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991) Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
23.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000) Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
24.
NicholsJ. D.MillerR. B. (1994) Cooperative learning and student motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 167–178.
25.
PetersonP.FennemaE. (1985) Effective teaching, students engagement in classroom activities, and sex-related differences in learning mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 309–335.
26.
RobinsonW. R.NiazM. (1991) Performance based on instruction by lecture or by interaction and its relationship to cognitive variables. International Journal of Science Education, 13, 203–215.
27.
SharanS. (1994) Handbook of cooperative learning methods. New York: Greenwood.
28.
SlavinR. E. (1978) Student teams and achievement divisions. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12, 39–49.
29.
SlavinR. E. (1989) Cooperative learning and student achievement. In SlavinR. E. (Ed.), School and classroom organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 129–156.
30.
SlavinR. E. (1990a) Research on cooperative learning: consensus and controversy. Educational Leadership, 47, 52–54.
31.
SlavinR. E. (1990b) Student team learning in mathematics. In DavidsonN. (Ed.), Cooperative learning in mathematics: a handbook for teachers. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley. Pp. 69–102.
32.
SlavinR. E. (1996) Reforming state and federal policies to support adoption of proven practices. Educational Researcher, 25(9), 4–5.
33.
TourkiM. A. (1980) [Studies in the psychology of personality in the Arab countries]. Kuwait, Kuwait: Al-Sabah Establishment in Arabic]
34.
WasfiA. (1983) [The Arab family: studies in the Arab society]. Al-Ain, UAE: United Arab Emirates Univer. Press in Arabic]
