Honesty questionnaires are often validated against a paper-and-pencil criterion in which respondents are asked to admit to past incidents of dishonesty. However, substantial overlap in the methods of assessment and in item content between predictor and criterion suggest that it is not validity that is being assessed, but rather a form of reliability. In this study, the relations between two overt measures of honesty (the Phase II Profile and the Workplace Productivity Questionnaire) and an admissions criterion were evaluated. The results suggest that the strong correlations between the Phase II Profile and the admissions criterion (r = −.67) and between scores on the Workplace Productivity Questionnaire and the admissions criterion (r = −.62) may be largely due to overlapping item content.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlvordG. (1985) Validation of the Personnel Selection Inventory as a screening test for bus operators. Journal of Security Administration, 8, 37–47.
2.
AshtonM. C. (1998) Personality and job performance: the importance of narrow traits. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 289–303.
3.
BokS. (1992) Deceit. In BeckerL. C.BeckerC. B. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of ethics. Vol. 1. New York: Garland. Pp. 242–245.
4.
CamaraW. J.SchneiderD. L. (1995) Questions of construct breadth and openness of research in integrity testing. American Psychologist, 50, 459–460.
5.
CampbellD. T.FiskeD. W. (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait–multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.
6.
DeVellisR. F. (1991) Scale development—theory and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
FitzhenryWhiteside. (1978) Funk & Wagnall's Standard college dictionary. (6th ed.) Montreal, Canada: Author.
8.
FrostA. G.RafilsonF. M. (1989) Overt integrity tests versus personality-based measures of delinquency: an empirical comparison. Journal of Business and Psychology, 3, 269–277.
9.
GoldbergL. R.GrenierJ. R.GuionR. M.SechrestL. B.WingH. (1991) Questionnaires used in the prediction of trustworthiness in pre-employment selection decisions: an APA task force report. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10.
GuastelloS. J.RiekeM. L. A. (1991) Review and critique of honesty test research. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 9, 501–523.
11.
HarrisW. G.DillonC. K. (1989) Stanton Survey Test manual. Charlotte, NC: Stanton Corp.
12.
HollingerR. C.ClarkJ. P. (1983) Theft by employees. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
13.
JacksonD. N. (1971) The dynamics of structured personality tests: 1971. Psychological Review, 78, 229–248.
14.
JacksonD. N. (1984) Personality Research Form manual. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.
15.
LassonE. D.BassA. R. (1997) Integrity testing and deviance: construct validity issues and the role of situational factors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 12, 121–146.
16.
LilienfeldS. O. (1993) Do honesty tests really measure honesty?Skeptical Inquirer, 18, 32–41.
17.
LoevingerJ. (1957) Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory. Psychological Reports, 3, 635–694.
18.
London House, Inc. (1975) Personnel Selection Inventory manual. Park Ridge, IL: London House Press.
19.
Lousig-NontG. M. (1989) Phase II Profile: Integrity Status Inventory for Prospective Employees. Las Vegas NV: Lousig-Nont & Assoc.
20.
MartelliT. A. (1988) Preemployment screening for honesty: the construct validity, criterion-related validity, and test-retest reliability of a written integrity test. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio Univer.
21.
McDanielM. A.JonesJ. W. (1988) Predicting employee theft: a quantitative review of the validity of a standardized measure of dishonesty. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2, 327–345.
22.
MorettiD. M. (1986) The prediction of employee counterproductivity through attitude assessment. Journal of Business and Psychology, 1, 134–147.
23.
MurphyK. R. (1993) Honesty in the workplace. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
24.
NicolA. A. M. (1999) A measure of workplace honesty. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univer. of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
25.
OnesD. S.ViswesvaranC.SchmidtF. L. (1993) Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. [Monograph]Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 679–703.
ReidJ. E. (1967) The Reid Report. Chicago, IL: John E. Reid & Assoc.
28.
SackettP. R. (1994) Integrity testing for personnel selection. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 73–76.
29.
SackettP. R.BurrisL. R.CallahanC. (1989) Integrity testing for personnel selection: an update. Personnel Psychology, 42, 491–529.
30.
SackettP. R.HarrisM. M. (1984) Honesty testing for personnel selection: a review and critique. Personnel Psychology, 37, 221–245.
31.
SackettP. R.WanekJ. E. (1996) New developments in the use of measures of honesty, integrity, conscientiousness, dependability, trustworthiness, and reliability for personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 49, 787–829.
32.
SloraK. B. (1989) An empirical approach to determining employee deviance base rates. Journal of Business and Psychology, 4, 199–219.
33.
SnymanJ. H. (1990) Fakability of pre-employment paper-and-pencil honesty tests. Unpublished master's thesis, Radford Univer., Radford, VA.
34.
SobczakA. J. (1994) Cheating. In RothJ. K. (Ed.), Ethics. Pasadena, CA: Salem Press. Pp. 130–131.
35.
WernerS. H.JoyD. S.JonesJ. W. (1991) Improving corporate profitability with preemployment integrity tests. In JonesJ. W. (Ed.), Preemployment honesty testing. Westport, CT: Quorum Books. Pp. 53–61.
36.
WillisC. G. (1986) Stanton Survey. Test Critiques, 5, 451–457.
