The present study examined the correlation between cognitive style measured by the Group Embedded Figures Test and performance on two water-level tasks by 16 female graduate students. The mean of the absolute deviation from the horizontal was used as the water-level task performance. As predicted, rho was –.49. Greater deviation on the water-level task was associated with low scores on the Group Embedded Figures Test, indicating field dependence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarskyR. D.LachmanM. E. (1986) Understanding of horizontality in college women: effects of two training procedures. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 9, 31–43.
2.
CohenJ. (1992) A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
3.
HammerR. E.HofferN.KingW. L. (1995) Relationships among gender, cognitive style, academic major, and performance on the Piaget water-level task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 80, 771–778.
4.
HechtH.ProffittD. R. (1995) The price of expertise: effects of experience on the water-level task. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6, 90–95.
5.
KalichmanS. C. (1988) Individual differences in water-level task performance: a component-skills analysis. Developmental Review, 8, 273–295.
6.
MyerK. A.HensleyJ. H. (1984) Cognitive style, gender, and self-report of principle as predictors of adult performance on Piaget's water level task. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 144, 179–183.
7.
PiagetJ.InhelderB. (1956) The child's conception of space.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
8.
VastaR.LibenL. S. (1996) The water-level task: an intriguing puzzle. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 171–177.
9.
VastaR.RosenbergD.KnottJ. A.GazeC. E. (1997) Experience and the water-level task revisited: does expertise exact a price?Psychological Science, 8, 336–339.
10.
WitkinH. A.OltmanP. K.RaskinE.KarpS. A. (1971) Manual for the Embedded Figures Tests.Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
