This experiment had two purposes: investigation of the effect of variability in the content used during training on concept learning, retention, and transfer and the extent to which this training manipulation interacts with age Participants were 27 older adults (M = 68.2 yr., SD = 7.4) and 54 younger adults (M = 20.6 yr., SD = 4.0) who were asked to learn an imaginary disease by reviewing the symptoms of fictional patients. Participants were assigned to one of two variability groups in training, which were defined by how much patient cases resembled each other. Dependent measures were classification accuracy over eight blocks of training, followed by retention and transfer (“diagnosing new patients”) two days later. Analysis of variance yielded only one significant interaction of age and training variability (on retention), but none of the paired comparisons were significantly different. There were no main effects of training group on any dependent variable.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaddeleyA. D. (1978) The trouble with levels: a reexamination of Craik and Lockhart's framework for memory research. Psychological Review, 85, 139–152.
2.
CatalanoJ.KleinerB. (1984) Distant transfer in coincident timing as a function of variability of practice. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58, 851–856.
3.
CraikF. I.LockhartR. S. (1972) Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.
4.
DunhamP.MuellerR. (1993) Effect of fading knowledge of results on acquisition, retention, and transfer of a simple motor task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77, 1187–1192.
5.
DysonJ. (Ed.) (1990) Cecil Essentials of medicine. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.
6.
GoodeS.MagillR. A. (1986) The contextual interference effects in learning 3 badminton serves. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 57, 308–314.
7.
HarmanD.HollidayR.MeydaniM. (Eds.) (1998) Towards prolongation of the healthy life span: practical approaches to intervention. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
8.
HessT. M. (1982) Visual abstraction processes in young and old adults. Developmental Psychology, 18, 473–484.
9.
HessT. M.SlaughterS. J. (1986) Aging effects on prototype abstraction and concept identification. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 214–221.
10.
HomaD.ChamblissD. (1975) The relative contributions of common and distinctive information on the abstraction from ill-defined categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104, 351–359.
11.
HomaD.CrossJ.CornellD.GoldmanD.SchwartzS. (1973) Prototype abstraction and classification of new instances as a function of number of instances defining the prototype. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 101, 116–122.
12.
KintschW. (1994) Test comprehension, memory, and learning. American Psychologist, 49, 294–303.
13.
PosnerM. I.KeeleS. W. (1968) On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353–363.
14.
PosnerM. I.KeeleS. W. (1970) Retention of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 304–308.
RoschE.MervisC. B. (1975) Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 371–416.
17.
SandersR. E.GonzalezD. J.MurphyM.PestaB. (1999) Effects of variable practice and age on the retention and generalization of a cognitive skill. (Unpublished manuscript)
18.
SchmidtR. A.BjorkR. A. (1992) New conceptualizations of practice: common principles in three paradigms suggests new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3, 207–217.
19.
SheaJ. B.MorganR. L. (1979) Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 179–187.
20.
SparrowW. A. (1995) Acquisition and retention effects of reduced relative frequency of knowledge of results. Australian Journal of Psychology, 47, 97–104.
21.
SparrowW. A.SummersJ. J. (1992) Performance on trials without knowledge of results (KR) in reduced relative frequency presentations of KR. Journal of Motor Behavior, 24, 197–209.
22.
SternsH. L.GrayJ. H. (1999) Work, leisure, and retirement. In CavanaughJ. A.WhitbourneS. K. (Eds.), Gerontology: an interdisciplinary perspective. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univer. Press. Pp. 355–390.
23.
WinsteinC. J.SchmidtR. A. (1990) Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 677–691.
24.
WrisbergC. A.WulfG. (1997) Diminishing the effects of reduced frequency of knowledge of results on generalized motor program learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 29, 17–26.
25.
WulfG.LeeT. D.SchmidtR. A. (1994) Reducing knowledge of results about relative versus absolute timing: differential effects on learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 362–369.
26.
WulfG.SchmidtR. A. (1994) Feedback-induced variability and the learning of generalized motor programs. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 348–361.
27.
WulfG.SchmidtR. A. (1996) Average KR degrades parameter learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 28, 371–381.
28.
WulfG.SchmidtR. A.DeubelH. (1993) Reduced feedback frequency enhances generalized motor program learning but not parameterization learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1134–1150.
