A study using 1,008 “lost letters” was designed to test the hypotheses that returned responses would be greater in smaller rural communities than from cities, that addressees' affiliation with a group opposed to physical education in schools would reduce the return rate, and that a person-positivity effect would influence return rates. Community Size and Person-Positivity conditions were not significantly associated with different rates of return even though returned letters from the smaller rural communities were more frequent than those from the cities across addressee conditions. Findings seem to suggest no community bias in the willingness of people to help a stranger in need by returning a lost letter. Person-Positivity conditions did not seem to improve the technique. Both addressees' affiliations alone and community size and addressees' affiliations were associated with significantly different rates of return in smaller rural communities, with rates of return greater in the smaller rural communities than in the cities (except for the addressee opposed to physical education in schools).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmatoP. R. (1983) Helping behavior in urban and rural environments: Field studies based on a taxonomic organization of helping episodes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 571–586.
2.
BerscheidE.WalsterE. H. (1978) Interpersonal attraction. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
3.
BridgesF. S. (1996) Altruism toward deviant persons in cities, suburbs, and small towns. Psychological Reports, 79, 313–314.
4.
BridgesF. S.ClarkS. M. (2000) Differences in lost letter responses from smaller rural communities. North American Journal of Psychology, 2(1), 121–126.
5.
BridgesF. S.CoadyN. P. (1996a) Affiliation, urban size, urgency, and cost of responses to lost letters. Psychological Reports, 79, 775–780.
6.
BridgesF. S.CoadyN. P. (1996b) Urban size differences in incidence of altruistic behavior. Psychological Reports, 78, 307–312.
7.
BridgesF. S.RodriguezW. I. (2000) Gay-friendly affiliation, community size, and color of address in return of lost letters. North American Journal of Psychology, 2(1), 39–46.
8.
BridgesF. S.RyanS.ScheibeJ. J. (1998) Affiliation, community size, and destination in return of lost letters. Psychological Reports, 83, 1387–1393.
9.
BridgesF. S.ThompsonP. C.WillersM. H. (2000) Lost letter returns on five topics from urban, waterfront, and smaller rural communities. Psychological Reports, 86, 1097–1100.
10.
BridgesF. S.WelshR. L.GravesB. S.SonnM. B. (1997) Differences in lost letter and postal card returns from cities and smaller urban communities. Psychological Reports, 80, 363–368.
11.
BridgesF. S.WilliamsonC. B.ScheibeJ. J. (1998) Abortion affiliation, urban size, and geographic basis of responses to lost letters. Psychological Reports, 83, 1107–1112.
12.
BrustadR. J. (1993) Who will go out and play? Parental and psychological influences on children's attraction to physical activity. Pediatric Exercise Science, 5, 210–223.
13.
ByrneD. (1971) The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
14.
ForbesG. B.GromollH. F. (1971) The lost letter technique as a measure of social variables: Some exploratory findings. Social Forces, 50, 113–115
15.
HanssonR. O.SladeK. M. (1977) Altruism toward a deviant in city and small town. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 7, 272–279.
16.
JacobyJ.AranoffD. (1971) Political polling and the lost-letter technique. Journal of Social Psychology, 83, 109–212.
17.
KaplanM. F. (1976) Measurement and generality of response dispositions in person perception. Journal of Personality, 44, 179–194.
18.
MilgramS. (1970) The experience of living in cities. Science, 167, 1461–1468.
19.
MilgramS.MannL.HarterS. (1965) The lost-letter technique. Public Opinion Quarterly, 29, 437–438.
20.
MorrowJ. R.JacksonA. W.PayneV. G. (1999) Physical activity promotion and school physical education. PCPFS (President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports) Physical Activity and Fitness Research Digest, 3, 1–7.
21.
SearsD. O. (1983) The person-positivity bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 233–250.
22.
SearsD. O.BrownT. L.DittoP. H. (1982) “Humanness”, perceived similarity, and the person-positivity bias. (Unpublished manuscript, Univer. of California at Los Angeles)
23.
SearsD. O.WhitneyR. E. (1973) Political persuasion. In des PoolI.SchrammW.FreyF. W.MaccobyN.ParkerE. B. (Eds.), Handbook of communication. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally. Pp. 253–289.
24.
SimmonsC. H.ZumpfC. (1983) The lost letter technique revisited. The Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 510–514.
25.
SoleK.MartonJ.HornsteinH. A. (1975) Opinion similarity and helping: Three field experiments investigating the bases of promotive tension. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 1–13.
26.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS). (1996) Physical activity and health: A report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: USDHHS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion.
27.
WeinerM. J. (1975) A nonreactive predictor of a “liquor by the drink” referendum. The Journal of Social Psychology, 97, 103–106.
28.
WhiteheadG. I.MetzgerS. C. (1981) Helping behavior in urban and nonurban settings. The Journal of Social Psychology, 114, 295–296.
29.
WickerA. W. (1969) A failure to validate the lost-letter technique. Public Opinion Quarterly, 33, 260–262.
30.
Youth Risk Behavior Survey. (1998) Youth risk behavior surveillance United States, 1997. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
