This study was done to explore how perceived scores for leader-member exchange varies among temporary employees and permanent employees. Study of 158 subordinates indicated no significant difference between the two member groups.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AshfordS. J.TsuiA. S. (1991) Self-regulation for managerial effectiveness: The role of active feedback seeking. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 251–280.
2.
DieneschR. M.LidenR. C. (1986) Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11, 618–634.
3.
DockeryT. M.SteinerD. D. (1990) The role of the initial interaction in leader-member exchange. Group & Organizational Studies, 15, 395–413.
4.
FairhurstG. T. (1993) The leader-member exchange patterns of women leaders in industry: A discourse analysis. Communication Monographs, 60, 321–349.
5.
FiermanJ. (1994) The contingency workforce. Fortune, January 24, 30–36.
6.
GraenG. B.LidenR. C.HoelW. (1982) Role of leadership in the employee withdrawal process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 868–872.
7.
GraenG. B.ScanduraT. A. (1987) Toward a psychology of diadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175–208.
8.
SiasP. M.KramerM. W.JenkinsE. (1997) A comparison of the communication behaviors of temporary employees and new hires. Communication Research, 24, 731–754.
