A Symptom Checklist (SCL-90–R) is a potentially useful measure of psychological distress; it is frequently used in psychotherapy research and clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to illustrate the use of the SCL-90–R for determining statistically reliable change and clinical significance outlined by Jacobson and Truax in 1991. This paper describes the concepts of statistical and clinical significance of change. A proposal for obtaining and characterizing samples is made. Then a clinician's perspective is taken. Reliable change estimates and cut-off scores are chosen based on outcome data. Selected data from a single psychotherapeutic process and outcome study then were used to test the estimates of change and cut-off scores.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrykA. S.RaudenbushS. W. (1992) Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Davies-OsterkampS.StraussB. M.SchmitzN. (1996) Interpersonal problems as predictors of symptom related treatment outcome in longterm psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 6, 164–176.
3.
DerogatisL. R. (1994) The SCL-90–R®: administration, scoring and procedures manual. (3rd ed.) Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
4.
FolletteW. C.CallaghanG. M. (1996) The importance of the principle of clinical significance—defining significant to whom and for what purpose: a response to Tingey, Lambert, Burlinghame, and Hansen. Psychotherapy Research, 6, 133–143.
5.
FrankeG. H. (1992) Eine weitere Überprüfung der Symptom-Check-Liste (SCL-90–R) als Forschungsinstrument. Diagnostica, 38, 160–167.
6.
FrankeG. H. (1995) SCL-90–R: die Symptom-Check-Liste von Derogatis–Deutsche Version. Göttingen: Beltz Test Gesellschaft.
7.
FranzM.SchmitzN.TressW. (1997) Möglichkeiten zur empirischen Erfassung des Schweregrades psychogener Erkrankungen. Praxis Klinische Verhaltensmedizin und Rehabilitation, 37, 7–12.
8.
HärdleW. (1990) Applied nonparametric regression. New York: Cambridge Univer. Press.
9.
HartkampN. (1997) KLINDO-documentation and evaluation in psychotherapy research. (Unpublished computer program)
10.
HuberH. P. (1973) Psychometrische Einzelfalldiagnostik. Weinheim: Beltz Verlag.
11.
JacobsonN. S.FolletteW. C.RevenstorfD. (1984) Psychotherapy outcome research: methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance. Behavior Therapy, 15, 336–352.
12.
JacobsonN. S.FolletteW. C.RevenstorfD.BaucomD. H.HahlwegK.MargolinG. (1984) Variability in outcome and clinical significance of behavioral marital therapy: a reanalysis of outcome data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 497–504.
13.
JacobsonN. S.RevenstorfD. (1988) Statistics for assessing the clinical significance of psychotherapy techniques: issues, problems, and new developments. Behavioral Assessment, 10, 133–145.
14.
JacobsonN. S.TruaxP. (1991) Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12–19.
15.
MartinovichZ.SaundersS.HowardK. I. (1996) Some comments on “assessing clinical significance”. Psychotherapy Research, 6, 124–132.
16.
SchepankH. (1995) Der Beeinträchtigungsschwerescore (BSS): ein Instrument zur Bestimmung der Schwere einer psychogenen Erkrankung. Göttingen: Beltz Test Gesellschaft.
17.
SchmitzN.Davies-OsterkampS. (1997) Klinische und Statistische Signifikanz—diskutiert am Beispiel der Symptom-Check-Liste (SCL-90–R). Diagnostica, 43, 80–96.
18.
SchmitzN.HartkampN.TressW.KruseJ. (1999) Patienten in einer psychosomatischen/psychotherapeutischen Poliklinik: eine Übersicht. (Unpublished paper)
19.
ShedlerJ.MaymenM.ManisM. (1993) The illusion of mental health. American Psychologist, 48, 1117–1131.
20.
SpeerD. C.GreenbaumP. E. (1995) Five methods for computing significant individual client change and improvement rates: support for an individual growth curve approach. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 1044–1048.
21.
TingeyR. C.LambertM. J.BurlinghameG. M.HansenN. B. (1996) Assessing clinical significance: proposed extensions to method. Psychotherapy Research, 6, 133–143.
22.
TressW.KruseJ.HeckrathC.SchmitzN.AlbertiL. (1997) Psychogene Erkrankungen in hausärztlichen Praxen. Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin and Psychoanalyse, 43, 211–232.
