The use of a computerized, multiple-choice test bank to present practice and assessment tests on a network was evaluated with 46 men and 119 women from a first-year class in psychology. A correlation of .65 (p <. 001) between scores on a traditional paper-and-pencil test and scores on a computerized test provided some validity for the computerized assessment. Regression analysis showed that ability (previous academic performance) and motivation (number of practice tests taken) accounted for 73% of the explained variance in computerized test scores. Sex differences did not enter the regression equation significantly.
AndersonB.SimpsonM. (1998) Learning teaching at a distance: a social affair. Computers in New Zealand Schools, March, 25–29.
3.
BrothenT. (1994) A computer-assisted exercise that increases self-regulated studying. Journal of Developmental Education, 1, 18–21.
4.
BrothenT. (1996) A student-accessible computerized gradebook that facilitates self-regulated studying behavior. Teaching of Psychology23, 127–130.
5.
FraserG. S.CarrollM. I. (1994) SET Massey University student evaluation of teaching. Palmerston North, NZ. Massey Univer.
6.
LambertM. E. (1991) Effects of computer use during coursework on computer aversion. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 319–331.
7.
PearJ. P.NovakM. (1996) Computer-aided personalized system of instruction: a program evaluation. Teaching of Psychology, 23, 119–123.
8.
PremkumarG.RamamurthyK.KingW. R. (1993) Computer supported instruction and student characteristics: an experimental study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 9, 373–396.
