The explanatory styles of 46 Native and 48 Euro-American college students were compared on three scales, one measuring optimism for explaining bad events, one optimism for explaining good events, and total score combining the two. No significant differences were found, but the slight mean difference in scores on optimism for explaining good events suggested that Euro-Americans may be more optimistic in explaining positive events than are Native Americans.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LeeY. T.SeligmanM. E. P. (1997) Are Americans more optimistic than the Chinese?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 32–40.
2.
PetersonC.SemmelA.von BaeyerC.AbramsonL. Y.MetalskyG. I.SeligmanM E. P. (1982) The Attributional Style Questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 6. 287–299.
3.
PowersS.RossmanM. H. (1984) Attributions for school achievement of low-achieving Indian and Caucasian community college students. Psychological Reports, 55, 423–428.
4.
SeligmanM. E. P. (1984) The Attributional Style Questionnaire scoring key. Unpublished scoring key.
5.
SeligmanM. E. P.Nolen-HoeksemaS.ThorntonN.ThorntonK. M. (1990) Explanatory style as a mechanism of disappointing athletic performance. Psychological Science, 1, 143–146.
6.
SimmonsG.BarrineauP. (1994) Learning style and the Native American. Journal of Psychological Type, 28, 3–10.
