Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A delphi study was conducted to analyse the motivational profile of scientists working in research and development organisations using need hierarchy theory. The hierarchy of need and the concepts of basic motivation proposed by Maslow have received wide acceptance for the understanding they provide for organisational research. In this study an attempt was made to find out whether the scientists are motivated primarily by higher needs or not. 82 scientists representing four different research and development organisations in India took part. The results of two rounds show that the potential for self-accomplishment is neutralised by hurdles due to nonfulfilment or partial fulfilment of lower-order needs.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Argyris

(1964) Today's problem with tomorrow's organisations. Journal of Management Studies, 5, 31–55.

Campbell

G. P.

Hansen

J. T.

(1981) Manual for the Strong Vocational Interest Blank. (3rd ed.) Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univer. Dhawan

S. K.

Roy

(1993) Scientists and their job: Case study from India. Productivity Journal, 33, 650–655.

Goble

F. G.

(1970) The third force: The psychology of Abraham Maslow. New York: Pocket Books.

Grieg

I. D.

(1982) Basic motivation and personality in R&D management. R&D Management, 18, 113–122.

Griffiths

W. G.

Hill

R. C.

Judge

G. G.

(1993) Learning and practicing econometrics. New York: Wiley.

Gupta

S. P.

Clarke

E. H.

(1996) Theory and application of delphi technique: A bibliography (1975–1994). Technological forecasting and Social Change, 53, 185–211.

Herzberg

(1966) Work and the nature of man. New York: World.

Holland

J. L.

(1973) Making vocational choice: A theory of careers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Keller

R. T.

Holland

W. E.

(1981) The measurement of performance among research and development professional employees: A longitudinal analysis. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, San Jose, CA.

10.

Latham

G. R.

Mitchell

T. R.

(1976) Behavioural criteria and potential reinforcers in engineers/scientists in an industrial setting. Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology. New Delhi, India: Allied Publ.

11.

Likert

(1961) New patterns of management. New York: McGraw-Hill.

12.

Luthans

(1989) Organisational behaviour. New York: McGraw-Hill.

13.

Maslow

A. H.

(1954) Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.

14.

McGregor

D. M.

(1960) The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.

15.

McKelvey

Sekaran

(1977) Towards a career-based theory of job involvement: A study of scientists and engineers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 151–163.

16.

Pelz

Andrews

F. M.

(1976) Scientists in organisations: Productive climates for research and development. New York: Wiley.

17.

Pindyck

R. S.

Rubinfeld

D. C.

(1993) Econometric models and economic forecasts. (3rd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.

18.

Sahni

A. K.

(1979) Management and organisational climate for research and development. Manpower Journal, 15(2).

19.

Sengupta

S. R.

(1987) Report from the speech of the Director, IIT, Kharagpur to France, West Germany, UK and Italy from 12th June to 18th August 1959.

20.

Sichandra

(1970) Scientists: A social-psychological study. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Pvt. Co.

21.

Stacey

C. L.

De Martino

M. F.

(1958) Understanding human motivation. Cleveland, OH: Howard Allen.

22.

Sutaria

(1979) Two-factor theory: A comparative study in three types of organisation. Vikalpa, 4, 115–123.

23.

Vroom

V. H.

(1964) Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.

A Delphi Study of Motivational Profile of Scientists in Research and Development Organisations

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References