The previous tests of the Triangular Theory of Love have proven problematic, specifically centered on measurement of the three components of Intimacy, Passion, and Commitment. Factor analysis of a new set of measures for 123 women and 110 men indicated support for three distinct factors. Sex differences indicated that women scored significantly higher on Intimacy and Commitment than men. Components were also significantly related to a measure of Relational Satisfaction. Regression analysis indicated that each component predicted significant variance for scores on Satisfaction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AckerM.DavisM. H. (1992) Intimacy, passion and commitment in adult romantic relationships: A test of the triangular theory of love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 21–50.
2.
HatfieldE.SprecherS. (1986) Measuring passionate love in intimate relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 9, 383–410.
3.
HendrickC. D.HendrickS. S. (1989) Research on love: Does it measure up?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 784–794.
4.
HendrickS. S. (1988) A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the family, 50, 93–98.
5.
LundM. (1985) The development of investment and commitment scales for predicting continuity of personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 3–23.
6.
MillerR. S.LefcourtH. M. (1982) The assessment of social intimacy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 46, 514–518.
7.
RubinZ. (1970) Measurement of romantic love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 265–273.
8.
SternbergR. J. (1986) A triangular love theory. Psychological Review, 93, 119–135.
9.
SternbergR. J. (1988) Construct validation of a triangular theory of love. (Unpublished manuscript, Harvard Univer.).
10.
WhitleyB. E. (1993) Reliability and aspects of the construct validity of Sternberg's triangular love scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 475–480.
