Since the Social Interaction Self-statement Test was presented, a clear factor structure of the measure has not been defined. This situation is largely due to a lack of agreement among researchers with respect to the method of factoring, rotation criteria, and interpretation of factor loadings. The aim of the present study was to evaluate, using confirmatory factor analyses, the various factor models of the test. Results clearly supported a novel second-order factor model, which was developed by combining the current two- and five-factor models.
ArnkoffD. B.GlassC. R. (1989) Cognitive assessment in social anxiety and social phobia. Clinical Psychology Review, 9, 61–74.
3.
BentlerP. M. (1990) Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
4.
BentlerP. M.BonettD. G. (1980) Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.
5.
BollenK. A. (1986) Sample size and Bender and Bonett's nonnormed fit index. Psychometrika, 51, 375–377.
6.
BollenK. A. (1989) A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research17, 303–316.
7.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1989) Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 445–455.
8.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK ALongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Pp. 136–162.
9.
ChoY. (1998) The influence of dysfunctional beliefs and maladaptive automatic thoughts on socially phobic symptoms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul National Univer., Seoul, South Korea.
10.
ChoY.KimE.WonH. (1997) Cognitive assessment of social anxiety (II): A study on the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Social Interaction Self-statement Test. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 16, 233–249.
11.
ChurchA. T.BurkeP. J. (1994) Exploratory and confirmatory tests of the Big five and Tellegen's three- and four-dimensional models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 93–114.
12.
CudeckR.HenlyS. J. (1991) Model selection in covariance structures analysis and the “problem” of sample size: A clarification. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 512–519.
13.
GerbingD. W.AndersonJ. C. (1993) Monte Carlo evaluations of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Pp. 40–65.
14.
GlassC. R.MerluzziT. V.BieverJ. L.LarsenK. H. (1982) Cognitive assessment of social anxiety: Development and validation of a self-statement questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 6, 37–55.
15.
HofstedeG. (1980) Cultures consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16.
HuL-T.BentlerP. M. (1995) Evaluating model fit. In HoyleR. H. (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Pp. 76–99.
La DuT. J.TanakaJ. S. (1995) Incremental fit index changes for nested structural equation models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 289–316.
19.
MacCallumR. C.BrowneM. W.SugawaraH. M. (1996) Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149.
20.
MacCallumR. C.HongS. (1997) Power analysis in covariance structure modeling using GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 193–210.
21.
MarshH. W.BallaJ. R.HauK-T. (1996) An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical properties. In MarcoulidesG. A.SchumackerR. E. (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 315–353.
22.
MarshH. W.GraysonD. (1994) Longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis: Common, time-specific, item-specific, and residual-error components of variance. Structural Equation Modeling. 1, 116–145.
23.
MarshH. W.HocevarD. (1985) Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 562–582.
24.
McDonaldR. P. (1989) An index of goodness-of-fit based on noncentrality. Journal of Classification, 6, 97–103.
25.
McDonaldR. P.MarshH. W. (1990) Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 247–255.
26.
MulaikS. A. (1987) A brief history of the philosophical foundations of exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 22, 267–305.
27.
MulaikS. A.JamesL. R.AlstineJ. V.BennettN.LindS.StilwellC. D. (1989) Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 430–445.
28.
OsmanA.MarkwayK.OsmanJ. R. (1992) Psychometric properties of the Social Interaction Self-statement Test in a college sample. Psychological Reports, 71, 1171–1177.
29.
SteigerJ. H.LindJ. M. (1980) Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, LA.
30.
StopaL.ClarkD. M. (1993) Cognitive processes in social phobia. Behavior Research and Therapy, 31, 255–267.
31.
TanakaJ. S.HubaG. J. (1984) Confirmatory hierarchical factor analyses of psychological distress measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 621–635.
32.
TriandisH. C. (1989) The self and behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506–520.
33.
ZweigD. R.BrownS. D. (1985) Psychometric evaluation of a written stimulus presentation format for the Social Interaction Self-statement Test. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 9, 285–296.
