One school used computer-assisted instruction for 63 low-achieving students in Grade 5. Another school used traditional instruction for 48 low-achieving students in Grade 5. Higher posttest scores for the former were attributed to daily computer-assisted instruction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CookC. (1994) Factors affecting ILS implementation. Media & Methods, 30(3), 66–69.
2.
DewaltM. E.ParkerJ. (1994) Reading achievement: effects of computerized reading management and enrichment. ERS Spectrum, 12(1), 31–34.
3.
HayesJ. (1995) Instructional use of computers and related technologies in public schools: overview of status and trends. ERS Spectrum, 13(1), 3–6.
4.
WalkerM. (1993) Integrated learning systems. Media & Methods, 30(1), 14–15.
