Abstract
This study investigated the relationship between time sensitivity and purpose in life. Time sensitivity was operationally defined by scores on the Judging–Perceiving dimension of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and by whether subjects reported habitual watch-wearing. Scores indicating the Judging orientation and watch-wearing defined individuals who were most responsive to the dimension of time. Purpose in life was operationally defined by scores on the Crumbaugh and Maholick Purpose in Life Test. A multiple linear regression analysis showed no difference in scores on the Purpose in Life Test between Judgers and Perceivers, apparently supporting the Myers-Briggs perspective that having a specific temperament does not convey any special advantage in added value or meaning to one's life. Watch-wearing best predicted scores on the Purpose in Life Test. The results were discussed in terms of competing theoretical perspectives.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.