94 undergraduate students read a description of a legal case, involving either a theft or a murder, in which surname and occupational status of defendant were systematically varied. In addition to the nature of the crime, the surname of the defendant was associated with perceptions of the offence and the offender. Findings suggest that the connotations of a surname may influence judgments both by invoking stereotypes such as ethnicity and by semantic intrusion into the judgmental process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArthaudR. L.HohneckA. N.RamseyC. H.PrattK. C. (1948) The relation of family name preferences to their frequency in the culture. Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 19–37.
2.
BellR. A. (1984) Relationship of loneliness to desirability and uniqueness of first names. Psychological Reports, 55, 950.
3.
BrownI.HullinR. (1992) A study of sentencing in the Leeds magistrates' courts. British Journal of Criminology, 32, 41–53.
4.
BuchananB. A.BruningJ. L. (1971) Connotative meanings of first names and nicknames on three dimensions. Journal of Social Psychology, 85, 143–144.
5.
BusseT. V.SeraydarianL. (1979) First names and popularity in grade school children. Psychology in the Schools, 16, 149–153.
6.
ColmanA. M.SluckinW.HargreavesD. J. (1981) The effect of familiarity on preferences for surnames. British Journal of Psychology, 72, 363–369.
7.
ErwinP. G.CalevA. (1984) The influence of Christian name stereotypes on the marking of children's essays. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 6, 196–203.
8.
GarwoodS. G.SulzerJ. L.LevineD. W.CoxL.KaplanV. (1983) Should Henrietta be punished or rewarded? The effects of name desirability on responsibility attribution and sanction assignment. Names, 31, 318–333.
9.
HarariH.McDavidJ. W. (1973) Name stereotypes and teachers' expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 222–225.
10.
HartmannT. (1985a) A concept-specific semantic differential for the rating of German first and second names. Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 787–788.
11.
HartmannT. (1985b) Ratings of German personal names and E, P and A. Psychological Reports, 56, 859–862.
12.
KasofJ. (1993) Sex bias in the naming of stimulus persons. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 140–163.
13.
LawsonE. D. (1980) First names on campus: a semantic differential analysis. Names, 28, 69–83.
14.
LeakG. K.WareM. E. (1989) The role of name desirability on person perception. The Journal of Psychology, 123, 43–49.
15.
MairG. (1986) Ethnic minorities, probation, and the magistrates' courts: a pilot study. British Journal of Criminology, 26, 147–155.
16.
McDavidJ. W.HarariH. (1966) Stereotyping of names and popularity in grade-school children. Child Development, 37, 453–459.
17.
MehrabianA.PiercyM. A. (1983) Positive or negative connotations of unconventionally and conventionally spelled names. The Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 445–451.
18.
OsborneY. H.RappoportN. B. (1985) Sentencing severity with mock jurors: predictive validity of three variable categories. Behavioral Science and the Law, 3, 467–473.
19.
RadeletM. C.PierceG. L. (1985) Race and prosecution discretion in homicide cases. Law and Society Review, 19, 587–621.
20.
SavageB. M.WellsF. L. (1948) A note on singularity in given names. Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 271–272.