Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 1998-2
Rebuttal to Ormond and Sulsky's Critique of Jawahar and Stone's Influence of Raters' Self-Consciousness and Appraisal Purpose on Leniency and Accuracy of Performance Ratings
Rejoinders to three issues raised by Ormond and Sulsky are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BernsteinI. H.TengG.GarbinC. P. (1986) A confirmatory factoring of the Self-consciousness Scale. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 21, 459–475.
2.
BurnkrantR. E.PageT. J. (1984) A modification of the Fenigstein, Scheier and Buss Self-consciousness Scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 629–637.
3.
BushmanB. J. (1993) What's in a name? The moderating role of public self-consciousness on the relation between brand label and brand preference. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 857–861.
4.
BussA. H. (1980) Self-consciousness and social anxiety. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
5.
CameronB.MyersJ. L. (1966) Some personality correlates of risk taking. Journal of General Psychology, 74, 51–60.
6.
FenigsteinA.ScheierM. F.BussA. H. (1975) Public and private self-consciousness: assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 522–527.
7.
JawaharI. M.StoneT. H. (1997) Influence of raters' self-consciousness and appraisal purpose on leniency and accuracy of performance ratings. Psychological Reports, 80, 323–336.
8.
LennoxR.WelchL.WolfeR.ZimmermanB. (1987) Assessment of self-consciousness. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 17, 53–74.
9.
NystedtL.SmariJ. (1989) Assessment of the Fenigstein, Scheier and Buss self-consciousness scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 342–352.
10.
OrmondW. E.SulskyL. M.Influence of raters' self-consciousness and appraisal purpose on leniency and accuracy of performance ratings: a critique. Psychological Reports, 1998, 82, 32–34.
11.
SulskyL. M.BalzerW. K. (1988) Meaning and measurement of performance rating accuracy: some methodological and theoretical concerns. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 497–506.
