Abstract
This study examined whether students are more likely to view a female author as biased and as having a political agenda when writing about gender than a male author. In the sample of 338 undergraduate students, the sex-related excerpt was rated as more biased, more subjective, and less scientific than the control reading. Female authors were rated as less objective and more likely to be presenting a personal view than male authors; however, no interaction between content of excerpt and sex of author occurred. The implications of these findings for research on sex and prejudice are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
