A group of 6 male and 8 female confederates asked 100 female respondents either “May I borrow…” or “Can I have…” one of five items: a cigarette, a quarter, a facial tissue, a pen, or a piece of paper. Although there was no significant effect for the type of request, respondents were significantly more likely to comply with the request for a pen or piece of paper.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CialdiniR. B. (1993) Influence. (3rd ed.) New York: HarperCollins.
2.
KitayamaS.BurnsteinE. (1988) Automaticity in conversations: a reexamination of the mindlessness hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 219–224.
3.
LangerE. J.BlankA.ChanowitzB. (1978) The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: the role of “placebic” information in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 635–642.
4.
LangerE. J.ImberL. G. (1980) Role of mindlessness in the perception of deviance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 360–367.
5.
LangerE. J.NewmanH. M. (1979) The role of mindlessness in a typical social psychological experiment. Personality and Social Psychology bulletin, 5, 295–298.
