Organizational researchers widely accept the 1957 work of Gouldner describing the influence of cosmopolitan-local “latent roles” on various organizational outcome variables. New cosmopolitan and local scales were described here for further research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CornwallJ. R.GrimesA. J. (1987) Cosmopolitan-local: A cross-lagged correlation analysis of the relationship between professional role orientations and behaviors in an academic organization. Human Relations, 40, 281–298.
2.
GoldbergA. I. (1976) The relationship of cosmopolitan/local orientations to professional values and behavior. Sociology of Work and Occupations, 3, 331–372.
3.
GouldnerA. W. (1957) Cosmopolitans and locals: Toward an analysis of latent social roles—I. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2, 281–306.
4.
GrimesA. J.BergerP. K. (1970) Cosmopolitan-local: Evaluation of the construct. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 407–416.
5.
RaelinJ. A. (1989) Professional and business ethics: Bridging the gap. Management Review, November, 39–42.
6.
TumaN. B.GrimesA. J. (1981) A comparison of models of role orientations of professionals in a research-oriented university. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 187–206.
7.
WrightT. A.LarwoodL.DohertyE. M. (1996) Use and misuse of the psychological contract: Reflections on an academic case. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5, 216–220.
