Astrology, as presently practiced (in either its traditional or psychological form), has no relevance to understanding ourselves or our place in the cosmos. Modern advocates of astrology cannot account for the underlying basis of astrological associations with terrestrial affairs, have no plausible explanation for its claims, and have not contributed anything of cognitive value to any field of the social sciences. Further, astrology does not have the theoretical or conceptual resources to resolve its own internal problems adequately or external anomalies or to adjudicate among conflicting astrological claims or systems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnkerbergJ.WeldonJ. (1989) Astrology: Do the heavens rule our destiny?Eugene, OR: Harvest House.
2.
AshmunJ. (1996) Astrology on the internet: Quality of discussion. Correlation, 15, 35–51.
3.
AveniA. F. (Ed.) (1992) The sky in Mayan literature. New York: Oxford Univer. Press.
4.
BaigentM. (1994) From the omens of Babylon: Astrology and ancient Mesopotamia. London: Penguin Arkana.
5.
BartonT. (1994) Ancient astrology. London: Routledge.
6.
BenskiC.CaudronD.GalifretY.KrivineJ.PeckerJ.RouzeM.SchatzmanE. (1996) The ‘Mars Effect’: A French test of over 1000 sports champions. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
7.
BlumenthalM. (1994) Commentary on Dean & Mather. Correlation, 13, 19.
8.
BokB.MayallM. (1941) Scientists look at astrology. Scientific Monthly, 52, 233–244.
9.
CampionN. (1996) Richard Dawkin's attack on astrology. The Astrological Journal, 38, 133–134.
10.
CarterC. (1952) Principles of astrology. London: TPH London.
11.
CazeauC. J.ScottS. D. (1979) Exploring the unknown: Great mysteries reexamined. New York: Plenum.
12.
CooperD. (1974) The gullibility gap. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
13.
CorneliusG. (1994) The moment of astrology. London, Eng.: Penguin Arkana.
14.
CorneliusG.HydeM.WebsterC. (1995) Astrology for beginners. Trumpington, Cambridge: Icon Books.
15.
CoudercP. (1951/1974) L'astrologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
CrewsF. (1996) The verdict on Freud. Psychological Science, 7, 63–68.
18.
CrickF. (1994) The astonishing hypothesis: The scientific search for the soul. New York: Scribner's.
19.
CroweR. (1990) Astrology and the scientific method. Psychological Reports, 67, 163–191.
20.
CulverR.IannaP. (1988) Astrology: True or false? a scientific evaluation. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.
21.
CurryP. A. (1992) A confusion of prophets: Victorian and Edwardian astrologyLondon: Collins & Brown.
22.
DanienE. C.SharerR. J. (Ed.) (1992) New theories on the ancient Maya. Philadelphia, PA: The University Museum, Univer. of Pennsylvania.
23.
DavidsonR. C. (1963, 1987) Astrology. Sebastopol, CA: CRCS publ.
24.
DawesR. M. (1994) House of cards: Psychology and psychotherapy built on myth. New York: Macmillan.
25.
DeanG. (1985) Can astrology predict E and N: The whole chart. Correlation, 5, 2–24.
26.
DeanG. (1992) Does astrology need to be true? In FrazierK. (Ed.), The hundredth monkey and other paradigms of the paranormal. Amherst, NY: Prometheus. Pp. 279–319.
27.
DeanG. (1993) Astrology strikes back—but to what effect?: Review of Perry's ‘Astrology's complete book of self-defense’ and West's “The case for astrology.'Skeptical Inquirer, 18, 42–49.
28.
DeanG. (1996a) A re-assessment of Jung's astrological experiment. Correlation, 14, 12–22.
29.
DeanG. (1996b) Review of the Magi Society's ‘Astrology Really Works.’Skeptical Inquirer, 21, 46–48.
30.
DeanG.KellyI. W.SaklofskeD. H.FurnhamA. (1992) Graphology and human judgement. In BeyersteinB.BeyersteinD. (Eds.), The write stuff: Evaluations of graphology. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus. Pp. 342–396.
31.
DeanG.LoptsonP. (1996) Some philosophical problems of astrology. Correlation, 14, 32–44.
32.
DeanG.LoptsonP.KellyI. W. (1996) Theories of astrology. Correlation, 15, 17–52.
33.
DeanG.MatherA. (1977) Recent advances in natal astrology: A critical review 1900–1976. Rockport, MA: Para Research, Inc
34.
DeanG.MatherA. (1996) Sun sign columns: An armchair invitation. Astrological Journal, 38, 143–155.
35.
DeanG.MatherA.KellyI. W. (1996) Astrology. In SteinG. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the paranormal. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus. Pp. 47–99.
36.
DeanG.NiasD. K. B.FrenchC. (1997) Graphology, astrology and parapsychology. In NyborgH. (Ed.), The scientific study of human nature: Tribute to Hans J. Eysenck. London: Elsevier. Pp. 42–60.
37.
DennettD. C. (1996) Kinds of minds: Toward an understanding of consciousness. New York: Basic Books.
38.
DoaneD. C. (1956) Astrology: 30 years research. Hollywood, CA: Professional Astrologers, Inc.
39.
DwyerT. (1985) How to write an astrological synthesis: A guide for students. Romford: Fowler.
40.
EislerR. (1946) The royal art of astrology. London: Michael Joseph.
ErtelS. (1990) Scrutinizing Gauquelin's character trait hypothesis once again. Correlation, 10, 3–19.
43.
ErtelS. (1992) Update on the ‘Mars Effect.’Skeptical Inquirer, 16, 150–160.
44.
ErtelS. (1993) Why the character trait hypothesis still fails. Correlation, 12, 2–9.
45.
ErtelS.IrvingK. (1996) The tenacious Mars effect. London: Urania Trust.
46.
ErtelS.IrvingK. (1997) Bias in Mars effect research. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 11, 1–18.
47.
EstersonA. (1993) Seductive mirage. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
48.
EysenckH. J.NiasD. K. (1982) Astrology: Science or superstition?New York: Penguin.
49.
EvansH. (1994) Critical review of West's ‘The case for astrology.’Journal of Scientific Exploration, 8, 411–415.
50.
FineR. (1973) The development of Freud's thought. New York: Jason Aronson.
51.
FlanaganO. (1992) Consciousness reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52.
FreedlandN. (1972) The occult explosion. London: Michael Joseph.
53.
FrenchR. (1996) Foretelling the future: Arabic astrology and English medicine in the late twelfth century, Isis, 87, 453–480.
54.
GallantR. A. (1974) Astrology: Sense or nonsense?Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
55.
GauquelinM. (1955) L'Influence des astres: Etude critique et experimentale. Paris: Editions du Dauphin.
56.
GauquelinM. (1966/1970) Astrology and science. London: Peter Davies. (Originally published in French, 1966)
57.
GauquelinM. (1969/1979) Dreams and illusions of astrology. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus. (Originally published in French, 1969)
58.
GauquelinF. (1980) Traditional symbolism in astrology and the character trait method. 8-Rue Amyot, 75005, Paris, France.
59.
GauquelinM. (1983) Birthtimes: A scientific investigation of the secrets of astrology. New York: Hill & Wang.
60.
GauquelinM. (1988) Written in the stars. Wellingborough, UK: Aquarian Press.
61.
GenevaA. (1995) Astrology and the seventeenth century mind: William Lilly and the language of the stars. Manchester, UK: Manchester Univer. Press.
62.
GordonR. (1993) The alarming history of medicine. London: Mandarin Paperbacks.
63.
GrossB. R. (1994) What could a feminist science be?The Monist, 11, 414–441.
64.
GroveW. M.MeehlP. E. (1996) Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical—statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 293–323.
65.
GrunbaumA. (1993) Validation in the clinical theory of psychoanalysis. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
66.
HandR. (1981) Horoscope symbols. Rockport, MA: Para Research.
67.
HarveyC. (1982) Review of Eysenck & Nias, ‘Astrology: Science or Superstition?’Correlation, 2, 47–48.
68.
HarveyC. (1994) Forward to ‘The Astiology of Time Twins.’ (Cited by DeanMather, 1996)
69.
HarveyC. (1995) Different approaches to astrological research. In PottengerM. (Ed.), Astrological research methods. Vol. 1. Los Angeles, CA: International Society for Astrological Research. Pp. 49–54.
70.
HinesT. (1988) Pseudoscience and the paranormal: A critical examination of the evidence. New York: St. Martin's Press.
JewsburyA. (1988) A new hypothesis to explain astrology. Astrological Journal, 30, 298–301.
73.
JonesP. (1996) Foundations of astrology. Astrological Journal, 38, 281–285.
74.
KanitscheiderB. (1991) A philosopher looks at astrologyInterdisciplinary Science Reviews, 16, 258–266.
75.
KellyI. W. (1979) Astrology and science: A critical examination. Psychological Reports, 44, 1231–1240.
76.
KellyI. W. (1997) Why astrology doesn't work. University of Saskatchewan, Canada (Unpublished manuscript)
77.
KellyI. W.CulverR.LoptsonP. (1989) Arguments of the astrologers. In BiswasS. K.MalikD. C. V.VishveshwaraC. V. (lids.), Cosmic perspectives. New York: Cambridge Univer. Press. Pp. 207–231.
78.
KellyI. W.DeanG.SaklofskeD. H. (1990) Astrology: A critical review. In GrimP. (Ed.), Philosophy of science and the occult. (2nd ed.). Albany, NY: State Univer. of New York Pp. 51–81.
KellyI. W.RottonJ.CulverR. (1996) The moon was full and nothing happened. In NickellJ.KarrB.GenoniT. (Ed.), The outer edge. Committee for Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal, P.O. Box 703. Amherst, NY 14226–0703. Pp. 16–34.
81.
KellyI. W.SaklofskeD. H. (1994) Psychology and pseudoscience. In Encyclopedia of human behavior. Vol. 3. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Pp. 611–618.
82.
KempS. (1990) Medieval psychology. New York: Greenwood Press.
83.
KerrJ. (1993) A most dangerous method. New York: Random House.
84.
KuhnT. (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions. (2nd ed.) Chicago, IL: Univer. of Chicago Press.
85.
KurtzP.NienhuysJ. W.SandhuR. (1997) Is the Mars effect genuine?Journal of Scientific Exploration, 11, 19–39.
86.
LeaheyT. H.LeaheyG. E. (1983) Psychology's occult doubles: Psychology and the problem of pseudoscience. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
MacmillanM. (1991) Freud evaluated. New York: Elsevier.
89.
MarneP. (1988) The concise graphology notebook. Slough, UK: Foulsham.
90.
MartensR.TrachetT. (1995) Astrologie, zin of onzin? [Astrology: Sense or nonsense?] Antwepren: Hadewisch.
91.
MayoD. G. (1996) Ducks, rabbits and normal science: Recasting the Kuhn's-eye view of Popper's demarcation of science. British Journal of Philosophy of Science, 47, 271–290.
92.
McGrewJ. H.McFallR. M. (1992) A collaborative Vernon Clark experiment. Correlation, 11, 2–10.
93.
MeehlP. E. (1995) Psychoanalysis is not yet a science. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 43, 1015–1023.
94.
NeherA. (1990) The psychology of transcendence. New York: Dover.
95.
NiasD. K. B.DeanG. (1986) Astrology and parapsychology. In ModgilS.ModgilC. (Eds.), Hans Eysenck: Consensus and controversy. London: Falmer Press. Pp. 357–371. (Updated in DeanNiasFrench, 1997)
96.
NienhuysJ. W. (1997) The Mars effect in retrospect. The Skeptical Inquirer.
97.
ParkerD. (1970) The question of astrology: A personal investigation. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode.
98.
PenroseR. (1994) Shadows of the mind: A search for the missing science of consciousness. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univer. Press.
99.
PerryG. (1988) Astrology as a diagnostic tool in psychotherapy. The Astrotherapy Newsletter, 1, 1–6.
100.
PerryG. (1992) The new paradigm and postmodern astrology. Astrological Journal, 34, 139–146.
101.
PerryG. (1994) Response to ‘Is the Scientific Approach Relevant to Astrology?’Correlation, 13(1), 32–36.
102.
PerryG. (1995a) How do we know what we think we know? From paradigm to method in astrological research. In PortengerM. (Ed.), Astrological research methods: Vol. 1. An ISAR anthology. Los Angeles, CA: International Society for Astrological Research. Pp. 12–48. [Reprinted with some modifications in The Astrological journal, 1997, 39 (1, 4–10, 2, 42–57, 3, 49–61]
103.
PerryG. (1995b) Assessing the feasibility of correlating psychological tests with astrology. In PottengerM. (Ed.), Astrological research methods: Vol. 1. An ISAR anthology. Los Angeles, CA: International Society for Astrological Research. Pp. 121–122.
104.
Placidus. (1657/1983) Primum mobile. A translation by CooperJohn in 1814 of ‘Tabulae Primi Mobilis [Reprinted in 1983. Bromley, Kent: ISCWA]
105.
PottengerM. (1994) Comments on Dean & Mather. Correlation, 13, 38.
106.
PremanandB.BhattyM.RisbudM. S. (1993) Astrology: Science or ego-trip. Indian Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal: 10-Chettipalayam Road, Podanus-641023 (Tamilnadu) India.
107.
PressN. (1993) New insights into astrology. San Diego, CA: ACS Publishing.
108.
RussellE. (1972) Astrology and prediction. London: Batsford.
109.
SearleJ. (1992) The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
110.
SevernJ. M. (1913) Popular phrenology. London: Rider.
111.
SeymourP. (1990) Astrology: The evidence of science. (Rev. ed.) New York: Viking Penguin.
112.
SeymourP. (1996) Astrology: The case for the defense. Astronomy Now, 11, 43–46.
113.
SladekJ. (1974) The new apocrypha: A guide to strange science and occult beliefs. New York: Stein & Day.
114.
SpenceD. P. (1994) The rhetorical voice of psychoanalysis: Displacement of evidence by theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univer. Press.
115.
StandenA. (1977) Forget your sun sign: An outline of antiastrology. Baton Rouge, LA: Legacy Publ.
116.
StartupM. (1981) The accuracy of astrologers' keywords: The origin of the planetary types. Correlation, 1, 24–36.
117.
StengerV. (1995) The unconscious quantum: Metaphysics in modern physics. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.
118.
StengerV. (1996) New age physics: Has science found the path to the ultimate?Free Inquiry, 16, 7–11.
119.
StewartJ. V. (1996) Astrology: What's really in the stars. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.
120.
SullowayF. (1992) Freud, biologist of the mind: Beyond the psychoanalytic legend. (Rev. ed.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univer. Press.
121.
TerpstraB. (1994) Comments on Dean & Mather. Correlation, 13, 39–42.
122.
TesterS. J. (1987) A history of western astrology. New York: Ballantine Books.
123.
ThagardP. (1980) Resemblance, correlation and pseudoscience. In HanenM.OsierM.WeyantR. G. (Eds.), Science, pseudoscience and society. Ottawa: Wilfrid Laurier Univer. Press. Pp. 85–102.
124.
ThomenA. A. (1938) Doctors don't believe it. London: Dent & Sons.
125.
TownleyJ. (1994) Comments on Dean & Mather. Correlation, 13, 42–43.
126.
Van RooijJ. (1994) The whole chart and nothing but the whole chart. Correlation, 13(1), 54–56.
127.
WebsterR. (1995) Why Freud was wrong: Sin, science, and psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.
128.
WestJ. A. (1991) The case for astrology. New York: Viking-Penguin.
129.
WhittL. A. (1992) Indices of theory promise. Philosophy of Science, 59, 612–634.
130.
WilsonJ. (1971) The complete book of palmistry. New York: Bantam.
131.
ZusneL.JonesW. H. (1989) Anomalistic psychology: A study of magical thinking. (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
