This paper uses the APA position on the Defense of Marriage Act to demonstrate that APA's advocacy policy regarding homosexual marriage is not based on science. It shows that the politics of advocacy have led a purportedly scientific organization to misinterpret, overgeneralize, and distort the results of research and to ignore the original purpose of the organization.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychological Association. (1991) American Psychological Association policy statements on lesbian and gay issues. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. P. 10.
2.
American Psychological Association. (1996a) Report of the APA Public Policy Office to the Council of Representatives. Washington, DC: APA Public Policy Office.
3.
American Psychological Association. (1996b) APA Public Policy Office legislative overview of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). Washington, DC: APA Public Policy Office.
4.
American Psychological Association. (1996c) American Psychological Association answers frequently asked questions regarding the Employment Nondiscrimination Act (ENDA). Washington, DC: APA Public Policy Office.
5.
BellA. P.WeinbergM. S.HammersmithS. (1981) Sexual preference: Its development in men and women. Bloomington, IN: Indiana Univer. Press.
6.
BerkeyB. R.Perelman-HallT.KurdekL. A. (1990) The multidimensional scale of sexuality. Journal of Homosexuality, 19, 67–86.
7.
BieberI.DainH.DinceP.DrellichM.GrandH.GundlachR.KremerM.RifkinA.WilburC.BieberT. (Society of Medical Psychoanalysts). (1962) Homosexuality: A psychoanalytic study. New York: Basic Books.
8.
De AngelisT. (1994) More research is needed on gay, lesbian, concerns. The APA Monitor, 25, 9(9), 39.
9.
De CeccoJ. P. (1981) Definition and meaning of sexual orientation. Journal of Homosexuality, 6, 51–67.
10.
GreenR. (1987) The “sissy boy” syndrome and the development of homosexuality. New Haven, CT: Yale Univer. Press.
11.
GuglielmoB. (1996) ACTION ALERT: Congress considers anti-gay bill on same-gender marriage. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Public Policy Office.
12.
HamerD. H.HuS.MagnusonV. L.HuW.PattatuciA. M. L. (1993) A linkage between DNA markers on the X chromosome and male sexual orientation. Science, 253, 321–327.
13.
HansenC. E.EvansA. (1985) Bisexuality reconsidered: An idea in pursuit of a definition. Journal of Homosexuality, 11, 1–6.
14.
KinseyA. C.PomeroyW. B.MartinC. E. (1948) Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.
15.
KleinF.SepekoffB.WolfT. J. (1985) Sexual orientation: A multi-variable dynamic process. Journal of Homosexuality, 11, 35–49.
16.
LeVayS. (1991) A difference in hypothalamic structure between heterosexual and homosexual men. Science, 253, 1034–1036.
17.
PattersonC. J. (1995) Lesbian and gay parenting: A resource for psychologists. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18.
PaulJ. P. (1985) Bisexuality: Reassessing our paradigms of sexuality. Journal of Homosexuality, 11, 21–33.
19.
SleekS. (1996) Research lights path to policy changes. The APA Monitor, 27(10), 54.
20.
TomesH. (1993) In the public interest. The APA Monitor, 24(4), 34.
21.
TomesH. (1997) In the public interest. The APA Monitor, 28(4), 48.
