This study indicated a combination of methods increased the return rate (80%) in a national survey of health educators (n = 546). Also, use of a $1.00 bill incentive was not significantly more effective than no incentive, and the rate of double responses in this anonymous mail survey was very low (1%).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ChebatJ.PicardJ. (1990) Does prenotification increase response rates in mail surveys? a self-perception approach. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 477–481.
2.
ChurchA. H. (1993) Estimating the effect of incentives on mail survey response rates: A meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 62–79.
3.
DoddD. D.BoswellD. L.LitwinW. J. (1988) Survey response rate as a function of number of signatures, signature ink color, and postscript on a covering letter. Psychological Reports, 63, 358.
4.
FoxR. J.CraskM. R.KimJ. (1988) Mail survey response rate: A meta-analysis of selected techniques for inducing response. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 467–491.
5.
GajrajA. M. (1990) A comparison of the effect of promised and provided lotteries, monetary and gift incentives on mail survey response rate, speed and cost. Journal of the Market Research Society, 32, 141–162.
6.
GillpatrickT. R.HarmonR. R.TsengL. P. (1994) The effect of an nominal monetary gift and different contacting approaches on mail survey response among engineers. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 41, 285–291.
7.
GitelsonR.KerstetterD.GuadagnoloF. (1993) Research note: The impact of incentives and three forms of postage on mail survey response rates. Leisure Sciences, 15, 321–327.
8.
JamesJ. M.BolsteinR. (1992) Large monetary incentives and their effect on mail survey response rates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 442–453.
9.
MaheuxB.LegaultC.LambertJ. (1989) Increasing response rate in physicians' mail surveys: An experimental study. American journal of Public Health, 79, 638–640.
10.
MurphyP. R. (1991) Exploring the effects of postcard prenotification on industrial firms' response to mail surveys. Journal of the Market Research Society, 33, 335–341.
11.
PourjalaliH.KimbrellJ. (1994) Effects of four instrumental variables on survey response. Psychological Reports, 75, 895–898.
12.
RamsdellL. B. (1995) Maximizing response rate in questionnaire research. American Journal of Health Behavior, 20, 50–56.
13.
RobersonM. T.SundstromE. (1990) Questionnaire design, return rates, and response favorableness in an employee attitude questionnaire. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 354–357.
14.
RoszkowskiM. J. (1990) Believe it or not: Longer questionnaires have lower response rates. Journal of Business and Psychology, 4, 495–509.
15.
SteeleT. J.SchwendigW. L.KilpatrickJ. A. (1992) Duplicate responses to multiple surveys: A problem?Journal of Advertising Research, 32, 26–32.
16.
TamborE. S.ChaseG. A.FadenR. R.GellerG.HofmanK. J.HoltzmanN. A. (1993) Improving response rates through incentive and follow-up: The effect on a survey of physicians' knowledge of genetics. American Journal of Public Health, 83, 1599–1604.
17.
YammarinoF. J.SkjnnerS. J.ChildersT. L. (1991) Understanding mail survey response rate: A meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 613–639.
