This study examined how 48 men and 88 women at a small southern university differed in their orientation toward and their uses of humor. They completed two self-report scales with reference to their general use of humor. Analysis indicated that the men reported a greater frequency of attempts at humor than women; men perceived these attempts as more effective than did the women; and the men reported using humor for negative affect more often than women.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Booth-ButterfieldS.Booth-ButterfieldM. (1991) Individual differences in the communication of humorous messages. Southern Communication Journal, 56, 205–218.
2.
CantorJ. R. (1976) What is funny to whom? The role of gender. Journal of Communication, 26, 110–118.
3.
CrawfordM.GressleyD. (1991) Creativity, caring, and context: women's and men's accounts of humor preferences and practices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 217–231.
4.
GrahamE. E.PapaM. J.BrooksG. P. (1992) Functions of humor in conversation: conceptualization and measurement. Western Journal of Communication, 56, 161–183.
5.
MorrisL. A. (Ed.) (1994) American women humorists. New York: Garland.
6.
NorrickN. R. (1993) Conversational joking: humor in everyday talk. Bloomington, IN: Indiana Univer. Press.
7.
PalmerJ. (1994) Taking humor seriously. New York: Routledge.
8.
RoweK. (1995) The unruly woman: gender and the genres of laughter. Austin, TX: Univer. of Texas Press.
9.
WalkerN.DresnerZ. (Eds.) (1988) Redressing the balance: American women's literary humor from colonial times to the 1980s. Jackson, MS: Univer. Press of Mississippi.
10.
WhiteC. L. (1988) Liberating laughter: an inquiry into the nature, content, and functions of feminist humor. In BateB.TaylorA. (Eds.), Women communicating: studies of women's talk. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Pp. 75–90.
