A survey was designed to obtain data from school psychology training programs regarding the teaching of personality assessment at the specialist (non-doctoral) level. 63 instructors of 99 courses in personality assessment responded to questions regarding course content and general strategies related to instruction in personality assessment. Questionnaire data pertained to the types of tests and techniques taught, the related topics covered, the percentage of instruction devoted to children and adults, and the amount of formal course work required. It was concluded that most programs offer one course at the specialist level covering a fairly consistent set of tests and related topics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GohD. S.TeslowC. J.FullerG. B. (1981) The practice of psychological assessment among school psychologists. Professional Psychology, 12, 696–706.
2.
HuttonJ. B.DubesR.MuirS. (1992) Assessment practices of school psychologists: ten years later. School Psychology Review, 21, 271–284.
3.
KnoffH. M. (1986) The assessment of child and adolescent personality. New York: Guilford.
4.
KnoffH. M. (1993) The utility of human figure drawings in personality and intellectual assessment: why ask why?School Psychology Quarterly, 8, 191–196.
5.
MeirS. T. (1993) Revitalizing the measurement curriculum. American Psychologist, 48886–891.
6.
National Association of School Psychologists. (1994) Standards for training and field placement programs in school psychology. Washington, DC: Author.
7.
ProutA. T. (1983) School psychologists and social-emotional assessment techniques: patterns in training and use. School Psychology Review, 12, 377–383.
8.
PrusJ. (1996) NASP-approved graduate programs in school psychology. Communique, 25, 8.
9.
RamageJ. (1979) National survey of school psychologists: update. School Psychology Digest, 8, 153–161.
10.
ReschlyD. J.GenshaftJ.BinderM. S. (1987) The 1986 NASP survey: comparison of practitioners, NASP leadership and university faculty on key issues. Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
11.
ReschlyD. J.WilsonM. S. (1997) Characteristics of school psychology graduate education: implications for the entry-level discussion and doctoral-level specialty definition. School Psychology Review, 26, 74–92.
12.
WilsonM. S.ReschlyD. J. (1996) Assessment in school psychology training and practice. School Psychology Review, 25, 9–23.
