46 participants rated the distinctiveness of a series of 40 photographed faces of black and white targets. Average ratings of African-American male and female targets were higher for African-American raters than for white raters. Average ratings of Caucasian male and female targets were higher for Caucasian raters than for African-American raters. No significant effects of targets' sex or raters' sex were seen. Results are discussed in relation to cross-racial effects in face recognition by eyewitnesses.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnthonyT.CopperC.MullenB. (1992) Cross-racial facial identification: a social cognitive integration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 296–301.
2.
BothwellR. K.BrighamJ. C.MalpassR. S. (1989) Cross-racial identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 19–25.
3.
BrighamJ. C. (1990) Target person distinctiveness and attractiveness as moderator variables in the confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 101–115.
4.
BrighamJ. C.MalpassR. S. (1985) The role of experience and contact in the recognition of faces of own- and other-race persons. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 139–155.
5.
ChanceJ. E.GoldsteinA. G. (1996) The other-race effect and eyewitness identification. In SporerS. L.MalpassR. S.KoehnkenG. (Eds.), Psychological issues in eyewitness identification. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaura. Pp. 153–176.
6.
EllisH. D.DeregowskiJ. B.ShepherdJ. W. (1975) Descriptions of white and black faces by white and black subjects. International Journal of Psychology, 10, 119–123.
7.
FarleyC. J. (1996) TV's black flight: the fall schedules are out, and the shows with predominantly minority casts have landed in the low-rent neighborhoods. Time, 147(June 3), 66–68.
8.
LightL.Kayra-StuartF.HollanderS. (1979) Recognition memory for typical and unusual faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 5, 212–228.
9.
NarbyD. J.CutlerB. L.PenrodS. D. (1996) The effects of witness, target, and situational factors on eyewitness identifications. In SporerS. L.MalpassR. S.KoehnkenG. (Eds.), Psychological issues in eyewitness identification. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 23–52.
