The story of how a midwife many years ago dealt with defective newborns is used to illustrate complete control by a system external to the family. Similarities exist with current public policy concerning the interrelated issues of abortion, neonatal euthanasia, and infanticide in which the family system is often ignored. It is argued that the family's values, expectations, and desires are relevant to the establishment of public policy in this sensitive domain.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenM. C.DonohueP. K.DusmanA. E. (1993) The limit of viability—neonatal outcome of infants born at 22 to 25 weeks' gestation. The New England Journal of Medicine, 329, 1597–1601.
2.
GarlandM. J. (1983) Rescue, unless …. a review of the ethics of infant euthanasia. Advances in Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 4, 181–203.
3.
HuiE. C.GibbardW. B. (1993) “Thou shalt not kill”: a case against active euthanasia. Humane Medicine, 9, 207–215.
4.
ListerD. (1986) Ethical issues in infanticide of severely defective infants. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 135, 1401–1404.
5.
MagnetJ. E.KlugeE. W. (1985) Withholding treatment from defective newborn children. Cowansville, Quebec: Brown Legal Publications.
6.
MoseleyK. L. (1978) The history of infanticide in Western society. Issues in Law and Medicine, 1, 345–361.
7.
NewmanL. F. (1972) Birth control: an anthropological perspective. (Module 27) Reading, MA: Addison Wesley. Pp. 1–21.
8.
NewmanL. F. (1991) Historical and cross-cultural perspectives on abortion. In StotlandN. L. (Ed.), Psychiatric aspects of abortion. Issues in psychiatry. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press. Pp. 39–49.
9.
Non-treatment of defective newborn babies. (1979) Lancet, 2(8152), 1123–1124.
10.
SarasonS. B. (1986) And what is public interest?American Psychologist, 41, 899–905.
