Four procedures for assessment of metamemory knowledge about strategies are examined in relation to strategy use in a recall task by adults. Analysis provides evidence that only the procedure for assessment of knowledge about the usefulness of the categorical strategy when spontaneously expressed by the subject could predict its use on a free-recall task
FabriciusW. V.CavalierL. (1989) The role of causal theories about memory in young children's memory strategy choiceChild Development, 60, 298–308.
3.
Forrest-PressleyD. L.WallenT. (1984) Cognition, metacognition and reading. New York: Springer-Verlag.
4.
GarnerR. (1987) Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5.
GarnerR.BelcherV.WinfieldE.SmithT. (1985) Multiple measures of text summarization proficiency: what can fifth-grade students do?Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 140–153.
6.
JusticeE. M.Weaver-McDougallR. G. (1989) Adults' knowledge about memory: awareness and use of memory strategies across tasks, Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 214–219.
7.
KreutzerM.LeonardC.FlavellJ. (1975) An interview study of children's knowledge about memory. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 40, Series No. 159.
8.
MillerP. H.BigiL. (1979) The development of children's understanding of attention. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 25, 235–250.
9.
RoenkerD. L.ThompsonC. P.BrownS. C. (1971) Comparison of measures for the estimation of clustering in free recall. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 45–48.
10.
SchneiderW.PressleyM. (1989) Memory development between 2 and 20. New York: Springer-Verlag.
