This study investigated the possible effect of anonymity of response on the self-esteem of 289 12- and 13-yr.-old Hong Kong Chinese students in secondary school. Responses to the Self-description Questionnaire-1 by anonymous or non-anonymous groups differed according to the ability band of the students but not their gender. The higher the ability band, the higher was the tendency to report higher self-esteem in the anonymous condition. It is argued that researchers of self-concept may need to consider the implications of anonymity. In particular, the possibility of an interaction between anonymity and ability groups may well need to be taken into account when interpreting research into the influence of ability grouping on self-esteem.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BondM. H.CheungT. S. (1983) College students' spontaneous self-concept: the effect of culture among respondents in Hong Kong, Japan, and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 14, 153–171.
2.
BontempoR.LobelS.TriandisH. C. (1990) Compliance and value internalization in Brazil and the U.S.: effects of allocentrism and anonymity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 200–213.
3.
Booth-KewleyS.RosenfeldP.EdwardsJ. E. (1992) Impression management, social desirability, and computer administration of attitude questionnaires. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 562–566.
4.
EdwardsA. L. (1957) The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. New York: Dryden.
5.
FeatherN. (1973) Effects of response anonymity on assessment of own and school value systems and satisfaction with school. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 43, 140–150.
6.
FullerC. (1974) Effect of anonymity on return rate and response bias in a mail survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 292–296.
7.
HattieJ. (1992) The self-concept. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
HofstedeG. (1980) Culture's consequences: international differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9.
HoldenR. R.FekkenG. C. (1989) Three common social desirability scales: friends, acquaintances, or strangers?Journal of Research in Personality, 23, 180–191.
10.
HutC. H.TriandisH. C. (1985) Measurement in cross-cultural psychology: a review and comparison of strategiesJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 16, 131–152.
11.
IpG. W. M.BondM. H. (1995) Culture, values, and the spontaneous self-concept. Asian Journal of Psychology, 1, 29–35.
12.
KelmanH. C. (1958) Compliance, identification, and internalization: three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 51–60.
13.
KoslowskyM.ZeevU. B. (1990) Attitude profiles of anonymous responders. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 26, 359–364.
14.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991) Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.
15.
MarshH. W. (1988) The Self-description Questionnaire-1: manual and research monograph. San Antonio, TXPsychological Corporation.
16.
O'GradyK. E.JandaL. H. (1989) The effects of anonymity and dissimulation on the Differential Emotions Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 1033–1040.
17.
ShavelsonR. J.HubnerJ. J.StantonG. C. (1976) Self-concept: validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441.
18.
ShultzK. S.ChavezD. V. (1994) The reliability and validity of a social desirability scale in English and in Spanish. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 935–940.
19.
TamA. S. F. (1995) Exploring, measuring, and enhancing the self-concepts of Hong Kong Chinese adults with physical disabilities. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Univer. of Hong Kong.
20.
TriandisH. C. (1989) The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506–520.
21.
TriandisH. C.BrislinR.HuiC. H. (1988) Cross-cultural training across the individualism-collectivism divide. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 12, 269–289.
22.
WatkinsD. (1978) Relationship between the desire for anonymity and responses to a questionnaire on satisfaction with university. Psychological Reports, 42, 259–261.
23.
WatkinsD. (1995) Social desirability and the Self-description Questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 77, 376–378.
24.
WatkinsD.AkandfA. (1992) The internal structure of the Self-description Questionnaire: a Nigerian investigation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 120–125.
25.
WatkinsD.DoncQ. (1994) Assessing the self-esteem of Chinese school children. Educational Psychology, 13, 120–137.
26.
WatkinsD.LamM. K.RegmiM. (1991) Cross-cultural assessment of self-esteem: a Nepalese investigation. Psychologia, 34, 98–108.
27.
WylieR. C. (1989) Measures of self-concept. Lincoln, NE: Univer. of Nebraska Press.
