In a riot situation some individuals actively participate in antisocial behavior, but others do not, and still others act to discourage hostile activity. Four concepts from general psychology including (1) insufficiency of internal control or lack of internalized restraints acquired through learning, (2) effects of frustration, (3) emotional excitement, and (4) precipitating incidents (one or more) are proposed as contributors to the behavioral involvement of participants. Some hypotheses and the role of such variables as emotional contagion, imitation, opportunism, and anonymity are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DollardJ.DoobL.MillerN.MowrerO. H.SearsR. R. (1939) Frustration and aggression. New Haven, CT: Yale Univer. Press.
2.
LachmanS. J. (1993) Psychology and riots. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 30, 16–23.
3.
LachmanS. J. (1986) Restitution: a behavioral analog for undoingJournal of Reality Therapy, 5, 3–10.
4.
SmelserN. J. (1962) Theory of collective behavior. New York: Free Press.
5.
TriplettN. (1898) The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. American Journal of Psychology, 9, 507–533
6.
ZimbardoP. G. (1970) The human choice: individuation, reason and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. In ArnoldW. J.LevineD. (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1969. Lincoln, NE: Univer. of Nebraska Press. Pp. 237–307.
