A report by Woody, et al. (1996) raises the issue of making up for past discrimination by granting special treatment to women now. The ideological basis of this view is analyzed. It is a feminist argument based on (1) assumptions of affirmative action for “protected” groups, (2) an argument for “group rights” instead of equal opportunity “individual rights,” and (3) the identification by the person with the “victim's” role. These points question the value of affirmative action and the claim for group rights especially when based on past discrimination.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BairdC. L.BenskoN. L.BellP. A.VineyW., & WoodyW. D. (1995) Gender influence on perception of hostile environment sexual harassment. Psychological Reports, 77, 79–82.
2.
EisenmanR. (1995a) Affirmative action in the California state prisons. In EisenmanR., Readings in psychology.Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace. Pp. 27–28.
3.
EisenmanR. (1995b) Dubious value of the “reasonable woman” standard in understanding sexual harassment. Psychological Reports, 77, 1145–1146.
4.
WoodyW. D.VineyW.BellP. A., & BenskoN. L. (1996) Sexual harassment: the “reasonable person” vs “reasonable woman” standards have not been resolved. Psychological Reports, 78, 329–330.
