This study reports on relationships between teachers' immediacy and students' evaluations of the course and teacher, and differences among these variables based on teachers' and students' gender. Analysis showed that for 197 undergraduate students (105 women and 92 men) immediacy, course evaluation, and evaluations of their teachers (104 men and 92 women) were positively correlated. There were no differences by gender for immediacy, but three gender differences were found—female instructors received higher teacher and course ratings than their male peers, and female students with male instructors rated the course lower than any other gender grouping.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersenJ. F. (1979) Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. In NimmoD. (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 2.New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books. Pp. 543–559.
2.
BergquistW. H., & PhilipsS. R. (1977) A handbook for faculty development.Vol. 2. Washington, DC: Council for the Advancement of Small Colleges.
3.
BruschkeJ., & GartnerC. (1991) Teaching as communicating: advice for the higher education classroom. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 19, 197–214.
4.
KearneyP.PlaxT. G., & BurroughsN. F. (1991) An attributional analysis of college students' resistance decisions. Communication Education, 40, 325–341.
5.
McCroskeyJ. C.RichmondV. P.SallinenA.FayerJ. M., & BarracloughR. A. (1995) A cross-cultural and multi-behavioral analysis of the relationship between nonverbal immediacy and teacher evaluation. Communication Education, 44, 281–291.
MeredithG. M. (1976) Structure of the Teaching Analysis By Students (TABS). The Journal of Psychology, 92, 235–242.
8.
PotterW. J., & EmanuelR. (1990) Students' preferences for communication styles and their relationship to achievement. Communication Education, 39, 234–249.
9.
SandlerB. R. (1991) Women faculty at work in the classroom, or, why it still hurts to be a woman in labor. Communication Education, 40, 6–15.
