With the increasing popularity of low-cost videocommunications systems and their attendant low bandwidth-resolution problems, receivers are likely to experience difficulties in recognising the sender's intended expression and feeling. As an extension of previous work in the area, this pilot study investigated the effects of three forms of degraded imaging (and their combined effects) on the nonverbal aspects of communication for one person. Degraded video messages significantly impaired the meaning of the sender.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BassiliJ. N. (1979) Emotion recognition: the role of facial movement and the relative importance of upper and lower areas of the face. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2049–2058.
2.
BoucherJ. R., & EkmanP. (1975) Facial areas of emotional information. Journal of Communication, 25, 21–29.
3.
BradskawJ. L. (1969) The information conveyed by varying the dimensions of features in human outline faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 6, 5–9.
BullP. (1989) Non-verbal communication. In ColmanA. M. & BeaumontJ. G. (Eds.), Psychology Survey 7.Leicester: British Psychological Society. Pp. 79–101.
6.
EkmanP. (1984) Expression and the nature of emotion. In SchererK. R. & EkmanP. (Eds.), Approaches to emotion.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 319–344.
7.
EkmanP.BrattesaniK. A.O'SullivanM., & FriesenW. V. (1979) Does image size affect judgements of the face?Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 4, 57–61.
8.
HagerJ., & EkmanP. (1979) Long distance transmission of facial affect signals. Ethology and Sociobiology, 1, 77–82.
9.
HaigN. D. (1986) High resolution facial feature saliency mapping. Perception, 15, 373–386.
10.
HarmonL. D. (1973) The recognition of faces. Scientific American, 229, 71–82.
11.
HarmonL. D., & JulezB. (1973) Masking in visual recognition: effects of two-dimensional filtered noise. Science, 180, 1194–1197.
12.
KirouacG., & DorèF. Y. (1982) Identification des expressions faciales emotionnelles par un achantillon quebecois francophone. International Journal of Psychology, 17, 1–7.
13.
McAndrewF. T. (1986) A cross-cultural study of recognition thresholds for facial expression of emotion. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17, 211–224.
14.
McKelvieS. J. (1973) The meaningfulness and meaning of schematic faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 343–348.
15.
PowterE. J., & BeckwithR. C. (1988) LIVE-NET: an interactive switched video network for the University of London. International Journal of Digital and Analog Cabled Systems, 1, 19–28.
16.
ScottD. (1985) Asperger's syndrome and non-verbal communication: a pilot study. Psychological Medicine, 15, 683–687.
17.
SpenceS. (1980) Social skills training with children and adolescents.Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
18.
TiegerT., & GanzL. (1979) Recognition of faces in the presence of two-dimensional sinusoidal masks. Perception & Psychophysics, 26, 163–167.
19.
VitkovitchM., & BarberP. (1991) Facial speech at varying video frame rates. Published abstract of paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Applied Vision Association, “Perceiving Degraded Images,” Manchester, 8–10 April. Ophthalmology and Physiological Optometry, 11, 279.
20.
WallbottH. G. (1991) The robustness of communication of emotion via facial expression: emotion recognition from photographs with deteriorated pictorial quality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 89–98.
21.
WallbottH. G. (1992) Effects of distortion of spatial and temporal resolution of video stimuli on emotion attributions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 16, 5–20.
