Psychohistorians have uncovered a wealth of evidence suggesting that Hitler's psychopathology became projected and rationalized as social policy. Despite this cumulative evidence, no specific diagnosis has been generally accepted. The strengths and weaknesses of psychohistorical research and the ethical responsibilities involved in its use are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FreudS., & BullittW. (1967) Thomas Woodrow Wilson.Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
2.
InfieldG. B. (1974) Eva and Adolf.New York: Grosset & Dunlap.
3.
KellyD. M. (1947) 22 cells in Nuremberg.New York: Greenberg.
4.
KerstenF. (1947) The memoirs of Doctor Felix Kersten.Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
5.
KruegerK. (1941) Inside Adolf Hitler.New York: Avalon.
6.
KruegerK. (1942) I was Hitler's doctor.New York: Avalon.
7.
LangerW. C. (1972) The mind of Adolph Hitler.New York: Basic Books.
8.
LasswellH. (1930) Psychopathology and politics.Chicago, IL: Univer. of Chicago Press.
9.
MilgramS. (1974) Obedience to authority.New York: Harper & Row.
10.
PayneR. (1973) The life and death of Adolf Hitler.New York: Popular Library.
11.
PrittieT. (1961) Germany.New York: Time.
12.
ShirerW. L. (1960) The rise and fall of the Third Reich.New York: Simon & Schuster.
13.
TolandJ. (1976) Adolf Hitler.New York: Random House.
14.
VernonW. H. D. (1942) Hider, the man—notes for a case history. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 37, 295–308.
15.
WaiteR. G. L. (1977) The psychopathic god: Adolf Hitler.New York: Basic Books.