A comparison between 34 adolescents in a court-referred program for prevention of delinquency and 89 students not in the program but from the same high school showed that the students in the program were more likely to receive the social support they desired. Given the program's low rate of recidivism, the role of social support needs to be replicated and explored further.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgnewR. (1985) Social control theory and delinquency: a longitudinal test. Criminology, 23, 47–61.
2.
BrookJ. S.NomuraC., & CohenP. (1989) Prenatal, perinatal, and early childhood risk factors and drug involvement in adolescence. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 115, 221–241.
3.
BrookJ. S.WhitemanM.GordonA. S., & BrookD. W. (1984) Paternal determinants of female adolescent's marijuana use. Developmental Psychology, 20, 1032–1043.
4.
CernkovichS. A., & GiordanoP. C. (1987) Family relationships and delinquency. Criminology, 25, 295–319.
5.
GoldsteinA. P. (1990) Delinquents on delinquency.Champaign, IL: Research Press.
6.
LewandowskiL. M., & WestmanA. S. (1991) Drug use and its relation to high school students' activities. Psychological Reports, 68, 363–367.
7.
RutterM. (1971) Parent-child separation: psychological effects on the child. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 12, 233–260.
8.
SnyderJ. J. (1977) Reinforcement analysis of problem and nonproblem behaviors. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 528–535.
9.
TaniokaI., & GlaserD. (1991) School uniforms, routine activities, and the social control of delinquency in Japan. Youth and Society, 23, 50–75.
