44 subjects responded to the 16 PF Creativity scale and the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal to assess associations of scores on creativity with those on critical thinking. Pearson rs were significant and positive for subscales of Inference and Interpretations and Total Scale.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeyerB. K. (1987) Practical strategies for the teaching of thinking. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
2.
CattellR. B.CattellA. K.CattellH. E. (1978) 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire, Form A. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
3.
EnnisR. H. (1987) A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In BaronJ. B.SternbergR. J. (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: theory and practice. New York: Freeman. Pp. 9–26
4.
IPAT Staff. (1991) Administrator's manual for the 16 PF. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
5.
KrugS. E.JohnsE. F. (1986) A large-scale cross-validation of second-order personality structure as determined by the 16 PF. Psychological Reports, 59, 683–693.
6.
WatsonG.GlaserE. M. (1980a) Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
7.
WatsonG.GlaserE. M. (1980b) Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal, manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
