College students, 232 women and 151 men, read a simulated trial of rape by an acquaintance under one of four conditions: victim only drinking, offender only drinking, and both drinking or neither drinking before the alleged assault. How much students blamed the victim or offender for what happened and their verdict were unaffected by these conditions. Yet students rated alcohol consumption as having contributed to the alleged assault. Apparently, they simply did not attribute blame to consuming alcohol. How much students blamed the victim and the offender and having been or having known a rape victim predicted jurors' verdicts with 89% accuracy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FischerG. J. (1991) Cognitive predictors of not-guilty verdicts in a simulated acquaintance rape trial. Psychological Reports, 68, 1199–1206
2.
FischerG. J. (1993) Gender effects on individual and mock jury verdicts in a simulated acquaintance rape trial. Paper presented at meetings of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sex, in Seattle.
3.
HastieR. (1983) Social inference. Annual Review of Psychology, 34, 511–542.
4.
NorrisJ. (1989) Acquaintance rape: effects of victim's and assailant's alcohol consumption. Paper presented at meetings of the American Psychological Association, in New Orleans.
5.
NoarisJ.CubbinsL. (1992) Dating, drinking and rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 179–191.
6.
PughM. D. (1983) Contributory fault and rape convictions: log linear models for blaming the victim. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 233–242.
7.
RichardsonD.CampbellJ. L. (1982) Alcohol and rape: the effect of alcohol on attributions of blame for rape. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 468–476.
8.
WeinerR. L.Weiner-FeldmanA. T.GrissoT. (1989) Empathy and biased assimilation of testimonies in cases of alleged rape. Law & Human Behavior, 13, 343–355.
