Abstract
90 participants from 8 training environments provided self-assessments and peer-assessments of Kirton Adaption-Innovation scores after receiving a briefing on the topic. Correlations gave confirmatory support for the convergent validity of the instrument; however, the results indicated a more complex pattern of correlations of self-assessments and peer-assessments with actual inventory scores than has been suggested in earlier studies. The nature of the decision-making process appears to be an overlooked factor associated with the effectiveness of peer-assessments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
