To evaluate the suitability of the senior primary mathematics curriculum in Transkei, South Africa in enabling Standard 3 (Grade 5) and Standard 4 (Grade 6) pupils to achieve competency in mathematics, an overview of teaching techniques was obtained using participant observation and class teaching exercises. Analysis showed that teachers relied largely on closed-type teaching techniques and heavily on textbooks, while direct classroom observation indicated teachers' lack of ability to innovate and make teaching topical and dynamic. The pupils were generally unable to solve open-type questions, a situation attributed here to the teachers' rigid pattern of teaching.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AléS. O. (1989) Immediate priorities for school mathematics in developing countries—West Africa as case studies. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 21, 61–69.
2.
BarnesD. (1971) Language and learning in the classroom. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 3, 80.
3.
BeebyC. E. (1966) The quality of education in developing countries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univer. Press.
4.
BetelaT. N. (1991) Primary education in Transkei with emphasis on efficiency. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Univer. of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontein.
5.
ChapmanA.LeeA. (1990) Rethinking literacy and numeracy. Australian Journal of Education, 34, 277–289.
6.
CiuprykF. A.FraserB. J.MaloneJ. A.TobinK. (1989) Exemplary Grade 1 mathematics teaching: a case study. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 4, 40–49.
DelamontS. (1976) Interaction in the classroom. London: Methuen.
9.
Du PreezJ. N. (1980) The educational system of Transkei: a system description and needs assessment. Bloemfontein: Univer. of the Orange Free State.
10.
FlandersN. A. (1970) Analysing teaching behavior. New York: Addison-Wesley.
11.
GoodladJ. (1984) A place called school. New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
HawesH. (1978) Planning the primary school curriculum in developing countries. Paris: UNESCO.
13.
HerseeJ. (1987) The Cockcroft Report-before and after. In HowsonG. (Eds), Challenges and responses in mathematics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univer. Press. Pp. 86–96.
14.
KorboskyR.FraserB. J.TobinK. (1987) The potential of case studies of exemplary mathematics teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18, 886–893.
15.
LovittT. (1989) Problems in mathematics teaching: a case study. In CiuprykF. A.FraserB. J.MaloneJ. A.TobinK., Exemplary Grade 1 mathematics teaching: a case study. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 4, 40–49.
16.
MatotiS. M. (1992) The state of education in Transkei: 1990. Umtata: Univer. of Transkei.
17.
MetrowichT. P. (1989) Computer-assisted instruction and teacher in-service education in mathematics in primary schools for black children. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Univer. of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
18.
NgubentombiS. V. S. (1989) Education in the Republic of Transkei. Pretoria: Academica.
19.
OliverJ. (1992) An evaluation of the mathematics curriculum in senior primary schools in Transkei with particular emphasis on alternative strategies to promote competency in adult life. Unpublished D.Ed. thesis, Univer. of Transkei, Umtata.
20.
Taylor Report. (1979) Commission of enquiry into education in the Republic of Transkei. Umtata: Government Printer.
21.
Transkei Government. (1978) This is Transkei. Johannesburg: Chris van Rensburg.
22.
Transkei Government. (1987) Annual Report: Education. Umtata: Government Printer.
23.
Transkei Government. (1989) Annual Report: Education. Umtata: Government Printer.
24.
Transkei Government. (1990) Annual Report: Education. Umtata: Government Printer.
25.
Transkei Government. (1991) Annual Report: Education. Umtata: Government Printer.
