This study examined the relationship between domain-specific knowledge and the development of writing skills. 70 undergraduate and postgraduate subjects enrolled in an introductory educational psychology course were assessed for content knowledge and also produced a writing sample evaluating an article in the discipline. For the entire sample, content knowledge and writing proficiency were not significantly correlated. Using the scores of one rater, the 10 most knowledgeable subjects had significantly greater writing competency scores than the 10 least knowledgeable subjects. Using the scores of the other rater, this difference did not occur. Explanations of these results are provided.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderA.JudyJ. E. (1988) The interaction of domain-specific and strategic knowledge in academic performance. Review of Educational Research, 58, 373–404.
2.
ChaseW. G.SimonH. A. (1973) The mind's eye in chess. In ChaseW. G. (Ed.), Visual information processing. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 215–282.
3.
ChiM. T. H. (1985) Changing conceptions of sources of memory development. Human Development, 28, 50–56.
4.
ChiM. T. H.CeciS. J. (1987) Content knowledge: Its role, representation and restructuring in memory development. Advances in Child Development, 20, 91–142.
5.
ChiM. T. H.FeltovichP. J.GlaserR. (1981) Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.
6.
ChiM. T. H.ReesE. (1983) A learning framework for development. In ChiM. (Ed.), Trends in memory development research. Vol. 9. New York: Karger. Pp. 71–107.
EnnisR. H. (1989) Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed research. Educational Researcher, 18(13), 4–10.
9.
EtzioniA. (Ed.) (1969) The semi-professions and their organization. New York: Free Press.
10.
FaigleyL.CherryR. D.JolliffeD. A.SkinnerA. M. (1985) Assessing writers' knowledge and processes of composing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
11.
FlavellJ. H. (1971) What is memory development the development of?Human Development, 14, 225–286.
12.
GlaserR. (1984) Education and thinking: The role of knowledge. American Psychologist, 39, 93–104.
13.
HayesJ. R. (1990) Individuals and environments in writing instruction. In JonesB. F.IdolL. (Eds.), Dimensions of cognitive instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 241–263.
14.
JolliffeD. A.BrierE. M. (1988) Studying writers' knowledge in academic disciplines. In JolliffeD. A. (Ed.), Advances in writing research. Vol. 2. Writing in academic disciplines. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Pp. 35–87.
15.
LangerJ. (1984) Examining background knowledge and text comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 468–481.
16.
LarkinJ.McDermottJ.SimonD. P.SimonH. (1980) Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science. 208, 1335–1342.
17.
MarrM. B.GormleyK. (1982) Children's recall of familiar and unfamiliar text. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 89–104.
18.
McCutchenD. (1986) Domain knowledge and linguistic knowledge in the development of writing abilityJournal of Memory and Language, 25, 431–444.
19.
McPeckJ. E. (1981) Critical thinking and education. New York: St. Martin's Press.
20.
MoffettJ. W. (1968) Teaching the universe of discourse. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
21.
PaulR. (1982) Teaching critical thinking in the “strong” sense: A focus on self-deception, world views, and a dialectical mode of analysis. Informal Logic, 4, 3–7.
22.
PearsonP. D.RaphaelT. E. (1990) Reading comprehension as a dimension of thinking. In JonesB. F.IdolL. (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 209–240.
RechtD. R.LeslieL. (1988) Effect of prior knowledge on good and poor readers' memory of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 16–20.
25.
ResnickL. (1987) Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
26.
SchneiderW.KorkelJ.WeinertF. E. (1987) The knowledge base and memory performance: A comparison of academically successful and unsuccessful learners. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
27.
ToulminS. E. (1972) Human understanding: The collective use and evolution of concepts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univer. Press.
28.
VossJ. F.VesonderG. T.SpilichG. J. (1980) Text generation and recall by high-knowledge and low-knowledge individuals. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 651–667.
