120 subjects played a six-choice Prisoner's Dilemma game in which a simulated other employed either GRIT or GRIT/Tit-For-Tat with varying levels of communication. Analysis indicated that the addition of Tit-For-Tat to GRIT offers no advantages over the standard GRIT strategy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BetzB. (1991) Response to strategy and communication in an arms race-disarmament dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35, 678–690.
2.
PatchenM. (1987) Strategies for eliciting cooperation from an adversary: Laboratory and international findings. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31, 164–185.
