AllenG.ErikssonA. W.FellmanJ.ParisiP.VandenbergS. G. (1992).
Twinning and the r/K reproductive strategy: A critique of Rushton's theory. Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research,
41(1), 73–83.
2.
AndersonJ. L. (1991).
Rusthon’s racial comparisons: an ecological critique of theory and method. Canadian Psychology32, 73–83.
3.
BaileyR. C. (1997).
Hereditarian scientific fallacies. Genetica,
99(2–3), 125–133.
4.
CainD. P.VanderwolfC. H. (1990).
A critique of Rushton on race, brain size and intelligence. Personality and individual differences,
11(8), 777–784.
5.
PeregrineP. N.EmberC. R.EmberM. (2003).
Cross-cultural evaluation of predicted associations between race and behavior. Evolution and Human Behavior,
24(5), 357–364.
6.
YudellM.RobertsD.DeSalleR.TishkoffS. (2016).
Taking race out of human genetics. Science,
351(6273), 564–565.
7.
RushtonJ. P. (1990) Race and crime: A reply to Roberts and Gabor. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 32, 315–334.
8.
RushtonJ. P. (1994) Race and crime: A reply to Cernovsky and Litman. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 36, 79–82.
9.
RushtonJ. P. (1995) Race, evolution, and behavior: A life-history perspective. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
10.
WilsonJ. Q.HerrnsteinR. J. (1985) Crime and human nature. New York: Simon & Schuster.
11.
YeeA. H.FairchildH. H.WeizmannF.WyattG. E. (1993) Addressing psychology's problems with race. American Psychologist, 48, 1132–1140.
12.
ZuckermanM. (1990) Some dubious premises in research and theory on racial differences. American Psychologist, 45, 1297–1303.
