Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

An observational methodology was used to evaluate the differences between men's and women's conformity to a single source of influence. A total of 226 adults (115 men and 111 women) were observed in three cafeteria settings. Diners eating in pairs in which the lead diner selected a dessert were identified based on their sex and their position in dyad. The sex of the lead person (the model), the sex of following person (the subject), and whether the following person conformed to the lead by selecting a dessert were recorded. Analysis indicated a significant difference between men's and women's willingness to conform to one model. Women conformed more often than men when the models were male or female. Moreover, compared with men, they showed an even stronger tendency to conform to the behavior of a same-gender model.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asch

S. E.

(1956) Studies of independence and submission to group pressure: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70, No. 9 (Whole No. 417).

Barnard

W. A.

(1991) Group influence and the likelihood of a unanimous majority. The Journal of Psychology, 131, 607–614.

Campbell

J. D.

Fairey

P. J.

(1989) Informational and normative routes to conformity: The effect of faction size as a function of norm extremity and attention to the stimulus. The Journal of Social Psychology, 57, 457–468.

Campbell

J. D.

Tesser

Fairey

P. J.

(1986) Conformity and attention to the stimulus: Some temporal and contextual dynamics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 315–324.

Heatherton

T. F.

Herman

C. P.

Polivy

(1991) Effects of physical threats and ego threats on eating behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 138–143.

Laiané

Wolf

(1981) The social impact of majorities and minorities. Psychological Review, 88, 438–453.

Maslach

Santee

R. T.

Wade

(1987) Individualization, gender role, and dissent: Personality mediators of situational forces. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1088–1093.

Oetting

E. R.

Beauvais

(1987) Peer cluster and adolescent drug use: A path analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 205–213.

Santee

R. T.

Jackson

S. E.

(1982) Sex differences in the evaluative implications of conformity and dissent. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 121–125.

10.

Santee

R. T.

Maslach

(1982) To agree or not to agree: Personal dissent amid social pressure to conform. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 690–700.

11.

Striegel-Moore

Rodin

(1986) The influence of psychological variables in obesity. In Brownell

K. D.

Foreyt

J. P.

(Eds.), Handbook of eating disorders. New York: Basic Books. Pp. 99–121.

12.

Tanford

Penrod

(1984) Social influence model: A formal integration of research on majority and minority influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 189–225.

13.

Terre

Drabman

R. S.

Meydrech

E. F.

Hsu

H. S.

(1992) Relationship between peer status and health behaviors. Adolescence, 27, 595–602.

14.

van Roosmalen

E. H.

McDaniel

S. A.

(1989) Peer group influence as a factor in smoking behavior of adolescents. Adolescence, 24, 801–816.

Male and Female Conformity in Eating Behavior

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References