This study provided an initial test of a comprehensive model of individual performance. The extent to which one's opportunity, capacity, and willingness to perform predict one's actual performance is examined. A questionnaire designed to measure opportunity, capacity, and willingness was administered to 213 college students, while performance was measured by the students' grade point averages Scores on Capacity and Willingness interacted to provide a reasonably accurate prediction of performance, but the effect of scores on Opportunity was nonsignificant.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllisonP. D.LongJ. S. (1990) Departmental effects on scientific productivity. American Sociological Review, 55, 469–478.
2.
BanduraA. (1974) Behavior theory and the models of man. American Psychologist, 29, 859–869.
3.
BanduraA. (1977) Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4.
BlumbergM.PringleC. D. (1982) The missing opportunity in organizational research: some implications for a theory of work performance. Academy of Management Review, 7, 560–569.
5.
BrayfieldA. H.RotheH. F. (1951) An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35, 307–311.
6.
ColarelliS. M.DeanR. A.KonstansC. (1987) Comparative effects of personal and situational influences on job outcomes of new professionals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 558–566.
7.
DraperN. R.SmithH. (1966) Applied regression analysis. New York: Wiley.
8.
DunnetteM. D. (1972) Performance equals ability and what? [Unpublished paper, Univer. of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Reported by J. P. Campbell & R. D. Pritchard (1979), Research evidence pertaining to expectancy-instrumentality-valence theory. In SteersR. M.PorterL. W. (Eds.), Motivation and work behavior. (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill. Pp. 229–245.]
9.
FisherC. D.LockeE. A. (1992) The new look in job satisfaction research and theory. In CrannyC. J.SmithP. C.StoneE. F. (Eds.), Job satisfaction: how people feel about their jobs and how it affects their performance. New York: Lexington Books. Pp. 165–194.
10.
GhiselliE. E. (1966) The validity of occupational aptitude tests. New York: Wiley.
11.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R. (1974) The job Diagnostic Survey: an instrument for the diagnosis of jobs and the evaluation of job redesign projects. New Haven, CT: Department of Administrative Sciences, Yale Univer.
12.
HunterJ. E. (1983) A causal analysis of cognitive ability, job knowledge, job performance, and supervisor ratings In LandyF.ZedeckS.ClevelandJ. (Eds.), Performance measurement and theoryHillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 257–266.
13.
HunterJ. E.HunterR. F. (1984) Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 72–98.
14.
KleinbaumD. G.KupperL. L. (1978) Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury.
15.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (1990) A theory of goal setting & task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
16.
LorenceJ.MortimerJ. (1985) Job involvement through the life course. American Sociological Review, 50, 618–638.
17.
MaceC. A. (1935) Incentives: some experimental studies. (Industrial Health Research Board Report No. 72) London: H. M. Stationery Office.
18.
McClellandD. C. (1985) How motives, skills, and values determine what people do. American Psychologist, 40, 812–825.
19.
MitchellT. R. (1983) The effects of social, task, and situational factors on motivation, performance, and appraisal. In LandyF.ZedeckS.ClevelandJ. (Eds.), Performance measurement and theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 39–59.
20.
O'ConnorE. J.PetersL. H.PooyanA.WeekleyJ.FrankB.ErenkrantzB. (1984) Situational constraint effects on performance, affective reactions, and turnover: a field replication and extension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 663–672.
21.
PetersL. H.FisherC. D.O'ConnorE. J. (1982) The moderating effect of situational control of performance variance on the relationship between individual differences and performance. Personnel Psychology, 35, 609–621.
22.
PetersL. H.O'ConnorE. J.RudolfC. J. (1980) The behavioral and affective consequences of performance-relevant situational variables. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25, 79–96.
23.
RebneD. (1990) Determinants of individual productivity: a study of academic researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Institute of Industrial Relations, Univer. of California at Los Angeles. (Monograph and Research Series No. 53)
24.
SamuelsonP. A. (1976) Economics. (10th ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.
25.
SchmidtF. L.HunterJ. E.OuterbridgeA. N. (1986) Impact of job experience and ability on job knowledge, work sample performance, and supervisory ratings of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 432–439.
26.
Science Research Associates, Inc. (1952) SRA Attitude Survey. Chicago, IL: Industrial Relations Center of the University of Chicago.
27.
SteelR. P.MentoA. J. (1986) Impact of situational constraints on subjective and objective criteria of managerial job performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 254–265.
28.
SundstromE.BurtR. E.KampD. (1980) Privacy at work: architectural correlates of job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 101–117.
29.
VitelesM. S. (1953) Motivation and morale in industry. New York: Norton.
30.
VroomV. (1964) Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
31.
WagnerF. R.MorseJ. J. (1975) A measure of individual sense of competence. Psychological Reports, 36, 451–459.
32.
WaldmanD. A.SpanglerW. D. (1989) Putting together the pieces: a closer look at the determinants of job performance. Human Performance, 2, 29–59.
33.
ZaltmanG.BurgerP. C. (1975) Marketing research. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden.
