A study of the correlations between scores on the Matrix Analogies Test—Short Form and the WISC—R was conducted with 39 students enrolled in a Saturday program for the intellectually gifted. The Matrix Analogies Test was group-administered and WISC—R scores were obtained from records required for entry into the program. A significant Pearson r of .52 was found between the Matrix Analogies scores and the Performance IQs of the WISC—R; other correlations were not significant.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnastasiA. (1982) Psychological testing. New York: Macmillan.
2.
BardosA. N.PrewettP. N. (1991) Predictive validity of the Matrix Analogies Test—Short Form. Diagnostique, 16, 101–106.
3.
HaddadF. A.JulianoJ. M. (1991) Relations among scores on Matrix Analogies Test, Draw-A-Person, and the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills for low socioeconomic children. Psychological Reports, 69, 299–302.
4.
NaglieriJ. A. (1985a) Matrix Analogies Test—Expanded Form. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
5.
NaglieriJ. A. (1985b) Matrix Analogies Test—Short Form. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
6.
NaglieriJ. A. (1986) Test-retest reliability of the Matrix Analogies Test—Short Form. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63, 136–138.
7.
PrewettP. N.BardosA. N.NaglieriJ. A. (1988) Use of the Matrix Analogies Test—Short Form and the Draw-A-Person: a quantitative scoring system with learning-disabled and normal students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 6, 347–353.
8.
PrewettP. N.BardosA. N.NaglieriJ. A. (1989) Assessment of mentally retarded children with the Matrix Analogies Test—Short Form, Draw-A-Person and the Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement: a quantitative scoring system. Psychology in the Schools, 26, 254–260.
9.
SattlerJ. M. (1982) Assessment of children's intelligence and special abilities. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
