30 cooperators and 30 competitors were allowed to send a variety of influence attempts to a simulated other during a Prisoner's Dilemma game. Cooperators preferred the use of promises, whereas competitors preferred the use of threats.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BonomaT. V.TedeschiJ. T.HelmB. (1974) Some effects of target cooperation and reciprocated promises on conflict resolution. Sociometry, 37, 251–261.
2.
KuhlmanD. M.MarshelloA. F. J. (1975) Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategy effects in Prisoner's Dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 69–81.
3.
McClintockC. G. (1978) Social values: their definition, measurement, and development. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12, 121–137.
4.
SattlerD. N.KerrN. L. (1991) Might versus morality explored: motivational and cognitive bases for social motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 756–765.