Two speakers made videotaped speeches containing apt humor twice before a live audience; in one presentation the live audience laughed at the jokes and in the other there was no laughter. 64 students saw one tape with laughter, then one without and rated each speaker on ethos scales and on “interestingness” and “funniness.” They preferred the speaker who elicited laughter, but a significant order of speakers made the main findings conditional.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerloD.LemertJ. B.MertzR. J. (1959) Dimensions for evaluating the acceptability of message sources. Public Opinion Quarterly, 33, 563–577.
2.
ChapmanA. J. (1973) Funniness of jokes, canned laughter and recall performance. Sociometry, 36, 569–578.
3.
ChapmanA. J.ChapmanW. A. (1974) Responsiveness to humor: Its dependency upon a companion's humorous smiling and laughter. Journal of Psychology, 88, 245–252.
4.
FullerR. G. C.Sheehy-SkeffingtonA. (1974) Effects of group laughter on responses to humorous material, a replication and extension. Psychological Reports, 35, 531–534.
5.
GrunerC. R. (1967) The effect of humor on speaker ethos and audience information gain. The Journal of Communication, 17, 228–233.
6.
GrunerC. R. (1970) The effect on speaker ethos and audience information gain of humor in dull and interesting speeches. Central States Speech Journal, 21, 160–166.
7.
GrunerC. R. (1989) Audience reaction to ‘successful’ and ‘unsuccessful’ humor in an informative speech. Paper presented to Speech Communication Association, San Francisco, CA. (Copies available from the author).
8.
La GaipaJ. J. (1977) The effects of humor on the flow of conversation. In ChapmanA. J.FootH. C. (Eds.), It's a funny thing, humour. Oxford, UK: Pergamon. Pp. 421–427.
9.
MalpassL. F.FitzpatrickE. D. (1959) Social facilitation as a factor in reaction to humor. Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 295–303.
10.
McCroskeyJ. (1966) Scales for the measurement of ethos. Speech Monographs, 33, 65–72.
11.
MorrisonJ. (1940) A note concerning investigations on the constancy of audience laughter. Sociometry, 3, 179–185.
12.
NeuendorfK. A.FennellT. (1988) A social facilitation view of the generation of mirth reactions: Effects of a laugh track. Central States Speech Journal, 39, 37–48.
13.
PerlR. E. (1933) The influence of a social factor upon the appreciation of humor. American Journal of Psychology, 45, 308–312.
14.
ReidJ. K. (1971) The effect of humor on perceived attractiveness of a speaker. Unpublished master's thesis, Oklahoma State Univer., Stillwater.
15.
SmythM. M.FullerR. G. C. (1972) Effects of group laughter on responses to humorous material. Psychological Reports, 30, 132–134.
16.
TaylorP. M. (1971) An experimental study of humor and ethos. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 39, 359–366.
17.
YoungR. D.FryeM. (1966) Some are laughing: Some are not—why?Psychological Reports, 18, 747–754.
